Front Neurol. 2016 Sep 21;7:154. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00154. eCollection 2016.
Counteracting Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis with Right Parietal Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Frontiers in neurology
Katrin Hanken, Mona Bosse, Kim Möhrke, Paul Eling, Andreas Kastrup, Andrea Antal, Helmut Hildebrandt
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Klinikum Bremen-Ost, Bremen, Germany.
- Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg , Oldenburg , Germany.
- Department of Chemistry, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg , Oldenburg , Germany.
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen , Nijmegen , Netherlands.
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Bremen-Ost , Bremen , Germany.
- University Medical Center, Georg-August University Göttingen , Göttingen , Germany.
PMID: 27708612
PMCID: PMC5030283 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00154
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients appears to correlate with vigilance decrement as reflected in an increase in reaction time (RT) and errors with prolonged time-on-task.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right parietal or frontal cortex counteracts fatigue-associated vigilance decrement and subjective fatigue.
METHODS: In study I, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, anodal tDCS (1.5 mA) was delivered to the right parietal cortex or the right frontal cortex of 52 healthy participants during the first 20 min of a 40-min lasting visual vigilance task. Study II, also a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, investigated the effect of anodal tDCS (1.5 mA) over the right parietal cortex in 46 MS patients experiencing cognitive fatigue. tDCS was delivered for 20 min before patients performed a 20-min lasting visual vigilance task.
RESULTS: Study I showed that right parietal stimulation, but not right frontal stimulation, counteracts the increase in RT associated with vigilance decrement. Hence, only right parietal stimulation was applied to the MS patients in study II. Stimulation had a significant effect on vigilance decrement in mildly to moderately cognitively fatigued MS patients. Vigilance testing significantly increased the feeling of fatigue independent of stimulation.
CONCLUSION: Anodal tDCS over the right parietal cortex can counteract the increase in RTs during vigilance performance, but not the increase in subjective fatigue. This finding is compatible with our model of fatigue in MS, suggesting a dissociation between the feeling and the behavioral characteristics of fatigue.
Keywords: anodal tDCS; multiple sclerosis; right frontal cortex; right parietal cortex; subjective fatigue; vigilance decrement
References
- Can J Psychol. 1964 Sep;18:209-23 - PubMed
- Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463-92 - PubMed
- Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2304-10 - PubMed
- Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3426-35 - PubMed
- Hum Factors. 2003 Fall;45(3):349-59 - PubMed
- Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1129:305-22 - PubMed
- J Neurol. 2014 Aug;261(8):1552-8 - PubMed
- Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):375-89 - PubMed
- Brain. 1997 Feb;120 ( Pt 2):299-315 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2013 Oct 22;8(10):e77914 - PubMed
- AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 May;32(5):874-9 - PubMed
- Arch Neurol. 2010 Apr;67(4):447-53 - PubMed
- Mult Scler. 2003 Oct;9(5):503-8 - PubMed
- Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(3):423-36 - PubMed
- Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Mar;6:81-6 - PubMed
- Front Neurol. 2014 Dec 11;5:264 - PubMed
- Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302 - PubMed
- Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):433-41 - PubMed
- Mult Scler. 2009 Dec;15(12):1509-17 - PubMed
- Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):870-900 - PubMed
- NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(1):121-7 - PubMed
- Mult Scler. 2015 Apr;21(4):376-81 - PubMed
- J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9 - PubMed
- Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 3:909-17 - PubMed
- Sleep. 1992 Aug;15(4):376-81 - PubMed
- Emotion. 2002 Dec;2(4):315-40 - PubMed
- Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):91-100 - PubMed
- Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S76-84 - PubMed
- Yale J Biol Med. 2015 Sep 03;88(3):219-25 - PubMed
- Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2013 Oct;2(4):362-9 - PubMed
- Can J Neurol Sci. 2012 Mar;39(2):180-4 - PubMed
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):3314-9 - PubMed
- Hum Factors. 1993 Dec;35(4):603-14 - PubMed
- Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):608-15 - PubMed
- Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52 - PubMed
- Neuropsychologia. 1998 Dec;36(12):1325-34 - PubMed
- Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Nov 30;9:460 - PubMed
- Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3 - PubMed
- Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1754-62 - PubMed
- J Neurol Sci. 2008 Jul 15;270(1-2):28-39 - PubMed
- Mult Scler. 2010 Oct;16(10):1220-8 - PubMed
- Neuropsychologia. 1996 Nov;34(11):1085-95 - PubMed
- Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):495-504 - PubMed
- Mult Scler. 2009 Mar;15(3):337-44 - PubMed
- J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 May;9(3):392-408 - PubMed
- Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213 - PubMed
- J Neurol. 2007 May;254 Suppl 2:II58-64 - PubMed
- J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):1-47 - PubMed
- Neurology. 1997 Jun;48(6):1566-71 - PubMed
Publication Types