Display options
Share it on

Front Neurol. 2016 Sep 21;7:154. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00154. eCollection 2016.

Counteracting Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis with Right Parietal Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Frontiers in neurology

Katrin Hanken, Mona Bosse, Kim Möhrke, Paul Eling, Andreas Kastrup, Andrea Antal, Helmut Hildebrandt

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Klinikum Bremen-Ost, Bremen, Germany.
  2. Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg , Oldenburg , Germany.
  3. Department of Chemistry, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg , Oldenburg , Germany.
  4. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen , Nijmegen , Netherlands.
  5. Department of Neurology, Klinikum Bremen-Ost , Bremen , Germany.
  6. University Medical Center, Georg-August University Göttingen , Göttingen , Germany.

PMID: 27708612 PMCID: PMC5030283 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00154

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients appears to correlate with vigilance decrement as reflected in an increase in reaction time (RT) and errors with prolonged time-on-task.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right parietal or frontal cortex counteracts fatigue-associated vigilance decrement and subjective fatigue.

METHODS: In study I, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, anodal tDCS (1.5 mA) was delivered to the right parietal cortex or the right frontal cortex of 52 healthy participants during the first 20 min of a 40-min lasting visual vigilance task. Study II, also a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, investigated the effect of anodal tDCS (1.5 mA) over the right parietal cortex in 46 MS patients experiencing cognitive fatigue. tDCS was delivered for 20 min before patients performed a 20-min lasting visual vigilance task.

RESULTS: Study I showed that right parietal stimulation, but not right frontal stimulation, counteracts the increase in RT associated with vigilance decrement. Hence, only right parietal stimulation was applied to the MS patients in study II. Stimulation had a significant effect on vigilance decrement in mildly to moderately cognitively fatigued MS patients. Vigilance testing significantly increased the feeling of fatigue independent of stimulation.

CONCLUSION: Anodal tDCS over the right parietal cortex can counteract the increase in RTs during vigilance performance, but not the increase in subjective fatigue. This finding is compatible with our model of fatigue in MS, suggesting a dissociation between the feeling and the behavioral characteristics of fatigue.

Keywords: anodal tDCS; multiple sclerosis; right frontal cortex; right parietal cortex; subjective fatigue; vigilance decrement

References

  1. Can J Psychol. 1964 Sep;18:209-23 - PubMed
  2. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463-92 - PubMed
  3. Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2304-10 - PubMed
  4. Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3426-35 - PubMed
  5. Hum Factors. 2003 Fall;45(3):349-59 - PubMed
  6. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1129:305-22 - PubMed
  7. J Neurol. 2014 Aug;261(8):1552-8 - PubMed
  8. Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):375-89 - PubMed
  9. Brain. 1997 Feb;120 ( Pt 2):299-315 - PubMed
  10. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 22;8(10):e77914 - PubMed
  11. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 May;32(5):874-9 - PubMed
  12. Arch Neurol. 2010 Apr;67(4):447-53 - PubMed
  13. Mult Scler. 2003 Oct;9(5):503-8 - PubMed
  14. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(3):423-36 - PubMed
  15. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Mar;6:81-6 - PubMed
  16. Front Neurol. 2014 Dec 11;5:264 - PubMed
  17. Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302 - PubMed
  18. Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):433-41 - PubMed
  19. Mult Scler. 2009 Dec;15(12):1509-17 - PubMed
  20. Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):870-900 - PubMed
  21. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(1):121-7 - PubMed
  22. Mult Scler. 2015 Apr;21(4):376-81 - PubMed
  23. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9 - PubMed
  24. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 3:909-17 - PubMed
  25. Sleep. 1992 Aug;15(4):376-81 - PubMed
  26. Emotion. 2002 Dec;2(4):315-40 - PubMed
  27. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):91-100 - PubMed
  28. Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S76-84 - PubMed
  29. Yale J Biol Med. 2015 Sep 03;88(3):219-25 - PubMed
  30. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2013 Oct;2(4):362-9 - PubMed
  31. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012 Mar;39(2):180-4 - PubMed
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):3314-9 - PubMed
  33. Hum Factors. 1993 Dec;35(4):603-14 - PubMed
  34. Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):608-15 - PubMed
  35. Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52 - PubMed
  36. Neuropsychologia. 1998 Dec;36(12):1325-34 - PubMed
  37. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Nov 30;9:460 - PubMed
  38. Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3 - PubMed
  39. Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1754-62 - PubMed
  40. J Neurol Sci. 2008 Jul 15;270(1-2):28-39 - PubMed
  41. Mult Scler. 2010 Oct;16(10):1220-8 - PubMed
  42. Neuropsychologia. 1996 Nov;34(11):1085-95 - PubMed
  43. Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):495-504 - PubMed
  44. Mult Scler. 2009 Mar;15(3):337-44 - PubMed
  45. J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 May;9(3):392-408 - PubMed
  46. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213 - PubMed
  47. J Neurol. 2007 May;254 Suppl 2:II58-64 - PubMed
  48. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):1-47 - PubMed
  49. Neurology. 1997 Jun;48(6):1566-71 - PubMed

Publication Types