Display options
Share it on

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Sep 26;10:61. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0092-4. eCollection 2016.

Achievements of the Australian Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) program: summarising (almost) a decade of key evaluation data.

International journal of mental health systems

Bridget Bassilios, Angela Nicholas, Lennart Reifels, Kylie King, Justine Fletcher, Anna Machlin, Maria Ftanou, Grant Blashki, Philip Burgess, Jane Pirkis

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010 Australia ; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006 Australia.
  2. Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010 Australia.
  3. Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010 Australia.
  4. School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006 Australia.

PMID: 27708698 PMCID: PMC5037884 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-016-0092-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Introduced in July 2001, Australian Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) was the inaugural national policy initiative to provide community access to government-funded psychological services in primary care. Our aim was to examine the achievements of ATAPS in relation to its stated objectives using a set of indicators that largely drew on data from a minimum data set that we designed for the evaluation of ATAPS.

METHODS: We used de-identified professional-, consumer- and session-level data from the minimum dataset, and secondary analyses of our quantitative and qualitative data collected for a series of specific evaluation studies. Available data covered the period from 1 July 2003 to 31 December 2012.

RESULTS: Approximately 350,000 referrals were made to the ATAPS program over the 9.5 year analysis period, 79 % of which resulted in services. Over 1.4 million sessions were offered. Overall, 29 % of consumers were male, 4 % children, and 3 % Aboriginal people; 54 % of consumers had depression and 41 % an anxiety disorder; at least 60 % were on low incomes; and around 50 % resided outside of major cities. The most common interventions delivered were cognitive and behavioural therapies. Selected outcome measures indicated improvement in mental health symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: Access to Allied Psychological Services achieved its objectives within a decade of operation. The program delivered evidence-based services to a substantial number of consumers who were disadvantaged and historically would not have accessed services. Importantly, where data were available, there were indications that ATAPS achieved positive clinical outcomes for consumers. This suggests that ATAPS carved an important niche by successfully addressing unmet need of hard-to-reach consumers and through means that were not available via other programs. It will be interesting to see the effects from July 2016 of the reform of ATAPS, which will see ATAPS subsumed under psychological services commissioned by regional primary care organisations.

Keywords: Access to Allied Psychological Services; Mental health policy; Mental health service; Primary health care

References

  1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Oct;54(5):724-5 - PubMed
  2. J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Jun;46(6):697-702 - PubMed
  3. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007 Jul;34(4):377-87 - PubMed
  4. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001 Dec;36(12):595-603 - PubMed
  5. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;47(7):649-59 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 2005 Apr 9;330(7495):839-42 - PubMed
  7. Med J Aust. 2015 Mar 2;202(4):185-9 - PubMed
  8. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;34(6):997-1008 - PubMed
  9. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;44(11):997-1004 - PubMed
  10. J Ment Health. 2013 Oct;22(5):439-48 - PubMed
  11. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2012;43(2):129-51 - PubMed
  12. Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(1):62-73 - PubMed
  13. Med J Aust. 2012 Feb 6;196:118-21 - PubMed
  14. Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jan;35(1):79-89 - PubMed
  15. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6 - PubMed
  16. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;49(2):118-28 - PubMed
  17. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;43(7):615-23 - PubMed
  18. Med J Aust. 2004 Oct 4;181(7 Suppl):S15-20 - PubMed
  19. Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):312-7 - PubMed
  20. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43 - PubMed
  21. World Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;6(3):168-76 - PubMed
  22. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;36(2):210-6 - PubMed
  23. Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;178:145-53 - PubMed
  24. J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):1-13 - PubMed
  25. Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Sep 1;63(9):868-74 - PubMed
  26. Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76 - PubMed

Publication Types