Display options
Cite
Minarik T, Berger B, Althaus L, et al. The Importance of Sample Size for Reproducibility of tDCS Effects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:453doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00453.
Minarik, T., Berger, B., Althaus, L., Bader, V., Biebl, B., Brotzeller, F., Fusban, T., Hegemann, J., Jesteadt, L., Kalweit, L., Leitner, M., Linke, F., Nabielska, N., Reiter, T., Schmitt, D., Spraetz, A., & Sauseng, P. (2016). The Importance of Sample Size for Reproducibility of tDCS Effects. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 10453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00453
Minarik, Tamas, et al. "The Importance of Sample Size for Reproducibility of tDCS Effects." Frontiers in human neuroscience vol. 10 (2016): 453. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00453
Minarik T, Berger B, Althaus L, Bader V, Biebl B, Brotzeller F, Fusban T, Hegemann J, Jesteadt L, Kalweit L, Leitner M, Linke F, Nabielska N, Reiter T, Schmitt D, Spraetz A, Sauseng P. The Importance of Sample Size for Reproducibility of tDCS Effects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Sep 13;10:453. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00453. eCollection 2016. PMID: 27679568; PMCID: PMC5020062.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Sep 13;10:453. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00453. eCollection 2016.

The Importance of Sample Size for Reproducibility of tDCS Effects.

Frontiers in human neuroscience

Tamas Minarik, Barbara Berger, Laura Althaus, Veronika Bader, Bianca Biebl, Franziska Brotzeller, Theodor Fusban, Jessica Hegemann, Lea Jesteadt, Lukas Kalweit, Miriam Leitner, Francesca Linke, Natalia Nabielska, Thomas Reiter, Daniela Schmitt, Alexander Spraetz, Paul Sauseng

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Munich, Germany.

PMID: 27679568 PMCID: PMC5020062 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00453

[No abstract available.]

Keywords: M1; anodal tDCS; cathodal tDCS; choice reaction time task; open science; response times

References

  1. Brain Stimul. 2016 Mar-Apr;9(2):197-208 - PubMed
  2. Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jan;216(1):1-10 - PubMed
  3. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14 (5):365-76 - PubMed
  4. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 10;3:81 - PubMed
  5. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2016 Mar;29(1):11-7 - PubMed
  6. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0149794 - PubMed
  7. Biology (Basel). 2015 Mar 02;4(1):173-86 - PubMed
  8. Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2629-42 - PubMed
  9. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1031-48 - PubMed
  10. Neuroimage. 2016 Oct 15;140:33-40 - PubMed
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Aug;28(8):1063-89 - PubMed
  12. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9 - PubMed
  13. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):535-50 - PubMed
  14. Science. 2016 Apr 22;352(6284):397 - PubMed
  15. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):528-34 - PubMed
  16. Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):468-75 - PubMed
  17. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;114(11):2220-2; author reply 2222-3 - PubMed
  18. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 - PubMed
  19. Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716 - PubMed

Publication Types