Display options
Cite
Jalalian E, Zarbakhsh A, Mohtashamrad Z, et al. In Vitro Effect of Porcelain Firing Cycle and Different Thicknesses of IPS E.max CAD Core on Marginal Accuracy of All-Ceramic Restorations. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12(11):815-22
Jalalian, E., Zarbakhsh, A., Mohtashamrad, Z., Nourbakhsh, N., & Jafarpour, E. (2015). In Vitro Effect of Porcelain Firing Cycle and Different Thicknesses of IPS E.max CAD Core on Marginal Accuracy of All-Ceramic Restorations. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 12(11), 815-22.
Jalalian, Ezatollah, et al. "In Vitro Effect of Porcelain Firing Cycle and Different Thicknesses of IPS E.max CAD Core on Marginal Accuracy of All-Ceramic Restorations." Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran) vol. 12,11 (2015): 815-22.
Jalalian E, Zarbakhsh A, Mohtashamrad Z, Nourbakhsh N, Jafarpour E. In Vitro Effect of Porcelain Firing Cycle and Different Thicknesses of IPS E.max CAD Core on Marginal Accuracy of All-Ceramic Restorations. J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Nov;12(11):815-22. PMID: 27507992; PMCID: PMC4977405.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Nov;12(11):815-22.

In Vitro Effect of Porcelain Firing Cycle and Different Thicknesses of IPS E.max CAD Core on Marginal Accuracy of All-Ceramic Restorations.

Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran)

Ezatollah Jalalian, Arash Zarbakhsh, Zahra Mohtashamrad, Nazanin Nourbakhsh, Esmat Jafarpour

Affiliations

  1. Associate Professor, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Branch, Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Branch, Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Dentist, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 27507992 PMCID: PMC4977405

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Marginal adaptation is important for long-term success of full-coverage restorations. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of porcelain firing cycle and different thicknesses of IPS e.max core on marginal accuracy of all-ceramic restorations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standard stainless steel die with 0.8 mm classic chamfer finish line and 10° taper was used in this in vitro study. An impression was taken from the stainless steel die to fabricate 20 epoxy resin dies, which were then scanned and IPS e.max CAD cores were fabricated using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique in two groups of 10 with 0.7 mm (group A) and 0.4mm (group B) core thickness. Copings were then placed on their respective dies and randomly numbered. The amount of marginal gap was measured in 10 points under a stereomicroscope (×90 magnification) before and after porcelain veneering.

RESULTS: The mean gap in 0.7mm and 0.4mm core thicknesses was 15.62±2.55μm and 19.68±3.09μm before porcelain firing and 32.01±3.19μm and 35.24±3.8μm after porcelain firing. The difference in marginal gap between the two thicknesses was significant before porcelain firing but not significant after veneering. Significant differences were also found in the marginal gap before and after porcelain veneering in each group.

CONCLUSION: The porcelain firing cycle increases marginal gap in IPS e.max CAD restorations; 0.3 mm decrease in core thickness slightly increased marginal discrepancy, however it was not significant.

Keywords: Ceramics; Computer-Aided Design; Dental Porcelain; IPS e.max CAD LT

References

  1. J Oral Pathol. 1982 Dec;11(6):439-50 - PubMed
  2. Br Dent J. 1988 Jan 23;164(2):39-43 - PubMed
  3. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Jan;107(1):17-23 - PubMed
  4. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Dec;24(12):871-81 - PubMed
  5. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996 Aug;17(8):779-82, 784-6 passim; quiz 794 - PubMed
  6. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963 Jun;21:255-70 - PubMed
  7. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Apr;101(4):239-47 - PubMed
  8. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970 Dec;81(6):1395-401 - PubMed
  9. J Dent (Tehran). 2012 Summer;9(3):188-94 - PubMed
  10. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 1984 Oct;8:138-45 - PubMed
  11. J Prosthodont. 2008 Dec;17(8):621-6 - PubMed
  12. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002 Jul;23(7):637-41, 644, 646 passim; quiz 654 - PubMed
  13. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Mar;65(3):357-64 - PubMed
  14. Dent Mater. 2005 Jun;21(6):557-64 - PubMed
  15. J Prosthet Dent. 1982 Feb;47(2):146-53 - PubMed
  16. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 May;67(5):594-9 - PubMed
  17. J Prosthet Dent. 1976 Nov;36(5):517-22 - PubMed
  18. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):247-53 - PubMed
  19. J Prosthet Dent. 1971 Dec;26(6):621-6 - PubMed
  20. Br Dent J. 1971 Aug 3;131(3):107-11 - PubMed
  21. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Jun;61(6):664-9 - PubMed
  22. J Prosthet Dent. 1966 Mar-Apr;16(2):297-305 - PubMed
  23. Aust Dent J. 1995 Feb;40(1):17-21 - PubMed
  24. Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Sep-Oct;10(5):478-84 - PubMed
  25. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Dec;3(4):196-203 - PubMed
  26. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Dec;110(6):447-454.e10 - PubMed
  27. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Jul;26(7):582-93 - PubMed
  28. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Apr;85(4):363-76 - PubMed
  29. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Apr;93(4):346-55 - PubMed
  30. J Dent. 2012 Aug;40(8):670-7 - PubMed
  31. Int J Prosthodont. 2000 Sep-Oct;13(5):405-8 - PubMed
  32. Odontol Revy. 1970;21(3):337-46 - PubMed

Publication Types