Display options
Cite
Basude S, Trinder J, Caputo M, et al. Pregnancy outcome and follow-up cardiac outcome in women with aortic valve replacement. Obstet Med. 2014;7(1):29-33doi: 10.1177/1753495X13514382.
Basude, S., Trinder, J., Caputo, M., & Curtis, S. L. (2014). Pregnancy outcome and follow-up cardiac outcome in women with aortic valve replacement. Obstetric medicine, 7(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X13514382
Basude, Snehalata, et al. "Pregnancy outcome and follow-up cardiac outcome in women with aortic valve replacement." Obstetric medicine vol. 7,1 (2014): 29-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X13514382
Basude S, Trinder J, Caputo M, Curtis SL. Pregnancy outcome and follow-up cardiac outcome in women with aortic valve replacement. Obstet Med. 2014 Mar;7(1):29-33. doi: 10.1177/1753495X13514382. Epub 2014 Jan 15. PMID: 27512416; PMCID: PMC4934934.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Obstet Med. 2014 Mar;7(1):29-33. doi: 10.1177/1753495X13514382. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

Pregnancy outcome and follow-up cardiac outcome in women with aortic valve replacement.

Obstetric medicine

Snehalata Basude, Johanna Trinder, Massimo Caputo, Stephanie L Curtis

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics, St Michaels Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
  2. Bristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

PMID: 27512416 PMCID: PMC4934934 DOI: 10.1177/1753495X13514382

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the maternal, fetal and cardiac outcomes in women who have undergone aortic valve replacement.

METHOD: Retrospective observational study of all women with aortic valve replacement, who underwent a pregnancy (1998-2012). Maternal-, fetal- and valve-related cardiac outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS: Thirty-two pregnancies in 16 women with aortic valve replacement (nine bioprosthetic, six Ross and 17 mechanical) were evaluated. There were no adverse maternal events in the bioprosthetic and Ross groups but three in the mechanical group. Fetal loss rate was highest in the mechanical valve pregnancies (53%). One woman in the bioprosthetic group needed valve re-operation, and one woman in the mechanical valve group died. There was no difference in the change of Vmax over the follow-up between the valves (p = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in deterioration between aortic valve replacements during and after pregnancy. The highest risk of maternal and fetal complications occurred in the mechanical valve group.

Keywords: Bioprosthetic heart valve; Ross operation; aortic valve; mechanical heart valve; pregnancy; pulmonary autograft

References

  1. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):448-54 - PubMed
  2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 8;58(20):2130-8 - PubMed
  3. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(2):230-68 - PubMed
  4. Eur Heart J. 2011 Dec;32(24):3147-97 - PubMed
  5. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Dec;24(6):873-8 - PubMed
  6. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Feb;105(8):143-8 - PubMed
  7. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug;60(2 Suppl):S282-6; discussion S287 - PubMed
  8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):403-10 - PubMed
  9. Circulation. 1997 Oct 7;96(7):2206-14 - PubMed
  10. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Dec;66(6 Suppl):S40-3 - PubMed
  11. Am Heart J. 1999 Apr;137(4 Pt 1):714-20 - PubMed
  12. Neth Heart J. 2008 Dec;16(12):406-11 - PubMed
  13. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2012;4(2):83-7 - PubMed
  14. Circulation. 2009 Jan 20;119(2):222-8 - PubMed
  15. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Feb 1;111(3):382-7 - PubMed
  16. Eur Heart J. 2010 Sep;31(17):2124-32 - PubMed
  17. Circulation. 2008 Oct 7;118(15):e523-661 - PubMed
  18. Circulation. 1999 May 25;99(20):2669-76 - PubMed
  19. BJOG. 2000 Feb;107(2):245-53 - PubMed
  20. J Heart Valve Dis. 2007 Jul;16(4):398-403 - PubMed
  21. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(19):2451-96 - PubMed
  22. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Feb;119(2):210-20 - PubMed
  23. BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):1008-13; discussion 1012-3 - PubMed
  24. Eur Heart J. 1997 Oct;18(10 ):1659-62 - PubMed
  25. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Nov;11(6):864-9 - PubMed
  26. Anesth Analg. 2006 Aug;103(2):289-96, table of contents - PubMed
  27. Circulation. 2003 Mar 11;107(9):1240-6 - PubMed
  28. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jul;15(4):531-9 - PubMed
  29. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1991-2 - PubMed

Publication Types