Display options
Share it on

Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):896-89. doi: 10.12669/pjms.324.9645.

Sucralfate and Lidocain: Antacid 50:50 solution in Post Esophageal Variceal Band Ligation Pain.

Pakistan journal of medical sciences

Muhammad Hafeez, Ehsan Kadir, Anjum Aijaz

Affiliations

  1. Dr. Muhammad Hafeez, FCPS(Med), FCPS(Gastro) FACG, MASGE(USA), FRSPH, SCE RCP Gastro(UK).
  2. Assistant Professor of Medicine and Gastroenterologist, Combined Military Hospital Kharian Cantt Pakistan.
  3. Dr. Ehsan Kadir, M.Sc Nutrition Assistant Professor of Community Medicine, Combined Military Hospital Multan Pakistan.

PMID: 27648035 PMCID: PMC5017098 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.324.9645

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of pain relief of Sucralfate and lidocain antacid 50:50 solution in post esophageal variceal band ligation pain.

METHODS: All patients who had under gone Esophageal Variceal Band Ligation (EVBL) were included in the study. Patients un-willing to be included in the study or those who didn't have post EVBL pain were excluded. Patients with post EVBL pains were divided into two groups: one group was given sucralfate and other was given lidocaine: antacid 50:50 solution. Both were inquired about the duration of the pain relief after the medication. The results were analyzed on SPSS 23. Independent samples T-test was performed to find out whether the difference in duration of pain relief was significantly different in the two groups.

RESULTS: Out of 110 patients who have EVBL, 66(60.00%) had pain and 44(40.00%) were pain free. In the pain group 46 (69.7%) were given sucralfate and 20 (30.3%) were given lidocain: antacid 50:50 solution. Mean duration of pain relief in two groups was 2.78 (SD ± 2.096) and 2.5 days (SD ±. 0.76) respectively. Independent samples T-test results revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the duration of pain relief between these two groups with p value 0.426.

CONCLUSION: Both Sucralfate and Lidocain: antacid 50:50 solutions are effective in relieving the post EVBL pain. However, no statistically significant difference in duration of pain relief was detected in separate groups of patients treated with either treatment.

Keywords: EVBL; Lidocain: antacid; Post EVBL pain; Sucralfate

References

  1. Emerg Med J. 2006 Nov;23(11):873-4 - PubMed
  2. Surg Today. 2005;35(8):617-22 - PubMed
  3. Gut. 1986 Jun;27(6):710-3 - PubMed
  4. Gastroenterology. 2006 Jan;130(1):80-8 - PubMed
  5. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015 Jan-Mar;27(1):212-5 - PubMed
  6. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Mar-Apr;39(2):119-22 - PubMed
  7. Hepatology. 2004 Mar;39(3):746-53 - PubMed
  8. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003 Jun;13(6):321-4 - PubMed
  9. Hepatology. 2002 Mar;35(3):609-15 - PubMed
  10. Gastroenterology. 1980 Dec;79(6):1139-44 - PubMed
  11. Drugs. 1984 Mar;27(3):194-209 - PubMed
  12. Am J Med. 1987 Sep 28;83(3B):38-42 - PubMed
  13. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(2):261-78 - PubMed
  14. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2012 Jun;8(6):411-4 - PubMed
  15. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Nov;2(11):526-35 - PubMed
  16. Am J Med. 2000 Mar 6;108 Suppl 4a:87S-89S - PubMed

Publication Types