Display options
Share it on

Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Sep 29;13:E139. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160274.

A Content Analysis of Vaping Advertisements on Twitter, November 2014.

Preventing chronic disease

Shaina J Sowles, Melissa J Krauss, Sarah Connolly, Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8134, St. Louis, MO 63110. Email: [email protected].
  2. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

PMID: 27685432 PMCID: PMC5044552 DOI: 10.5888/pcd13.160274

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vaping has increased in popularity, and the potential harms and benefits are largely unknown. Vaping-related advertising is expected to grow as the vaping industry grows; people are exposed primarily to vaping advertisements on the Internet, and Twitter is an especially popular social medium among young people. The primary objective of our study was to describe the characteristics of vaping-related advertisements on Twitter.

METHODS: We collected data on 403,079 English-language tweets that appeared during November 2014 and contained vaping-related keywords. Using crowdsourcing services, we identified vaping-related advertisements in a random sample of 5,000 tweets. The advertisement tweets were qualitatively coded for popular marketing tactics by our research team. We also inferred the demographic characteristics of followers of 4 Twitter handles that advertised various novel vape products.

RESULTS: The random sample of 5,000 vaping-related tweets included 1,156 (23%) advertisement tweets that were further analyzed. Vape pens were advertised in nearly half of the advertisement tweets (47%), followed by e-juice (21%), which commonly mentioned flavors (42%). Coupons or price discounts were frequently observed (32%); only 3% of tweets mentioned vaping as a way to quit smoking or as an alternative to smoking. One handle had a disproportionately high percentage of racial/ethnic minority followers.

CONCLUSION: Vaping poses a threat to smoking prevention progress, and it is important for those in tobacco control to understand and counter the tactics used by vaping companies to entice their consumers, especially on social media where young people can easily view the content.

References

  1. JAMA. 2014 Aug 13;312(6):595-6 - PubMed
  2. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66317 - PubMed
  3. Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):1008-17 - PubMed
  4. Tob Control. 2016 Dec;25(e2):e107-e112 - PubMed
  5. Subst Abus. 2014;35(2):127-8 - PubMed
  6. JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23):2493-4 - PubMed
  7. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2014 Apr;5(2):67-86 - PubMed
  8. Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3:iii26-30 - PubMed
  9. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1195-202 - PubMed
  10. Addict Behav. 2016 May;56:41-50 - PubMed
  11. Lancet. 2013 Nov 16;382(9905):1629-37 - PubMed
  12. Fed Regist. 2016 May 10;81(90):28973-9106 - PubMed
  13. Neuropharmacology. 2014 Jan;76 Pt B:416-24 - PubMed
  14. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016 Apr;10 (2):130-5 - PubMed
  15. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 30;12:E121 - PubMed
  16. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1:I62-72 - PubMed
  17. Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun;105(6):e16-21 - PubMed
  18. J Adolesc Health. 2015 Feb;56(2):139-45 - PubMed
  19. JAMA. 2015 Aug 18;314(7):700-7 - PubMed
  20. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012 Apr 19;7:5 - PubMed
  21. Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3:iii41-7 - PubMed
  22. Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Oct;36:141-7 - PubMed
  23. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):392-4 - PubMed
  24. Tob Control. 2014 May;23 Suppl 2:ii4-10 - PubMed
  25. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Mar;169(3):e1563 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support