Display options
Share it on

World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(3):178-82. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.03.003.

Point-of-care ultrasound versus radiology department pelvic ultrasound on emergency department length of stay.

World journal of emergency medicine

Sean P Wilson, Kiah Connolly, Shadi Lahham, Mohammad Subeh, Chanel Fischetti, Alan Chiem, Ariel Aspen, Craig Anderson, John C Fox

Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA.
  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

PMID: 27547276 PMCID: PMC4988106 DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.03.003

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare the time to overall length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) versus radiology department ultrasound (RDUS).

METHODS: This was a prospective study on a convenience sample of patients who required pelvic ultrasound imaging as part of their emergency department (ED) assessment.

RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 194 patients who were on average 32 years-old. Ninety-eight (51%) patients were pregnant (<20 weeks). Time to completion of RDUS was 66 minutes longer than POCUS (95%CI 60-73, P<0.01). Patients randomized to the RDUS arm experienced a 120 minute longer ED length of stay (LOS) (95%CI 66-173, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION: In patients who require pelvic ultrasound as part of their diagnostic evaluation, POCUS resulted in a significant decrease in time to ultrasound and ED LOS.

Keywords: Intrauterine pregnancy; Length of stay; Pelvic ultrasound; Point-of-care ultrasound

References

  1. CJEM. 2009 Jul;11(4):355-64 - PubMed
  2. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 May;17 (3):170-5 - PubMed
  3. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):695-709 - PubMed
  4. Am J Emerg Med. 1990 Nov;8(6):515-22 - PubMed
  5. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011 Oct;37(4):231-40 - PubMed
  6. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Sep;7(9):988-93 - PubMed
  7. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jul;25(6):591-6 - PubMed
  8. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;27(3):283-9 - PubMed
  9. JAMA. 2013 Apr 24;309(16):1722-9 - PubMed
  10. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;30(9):1943-9 - PubMed
  11. Crit Care Clin. 2014 Apr;30(2):207-26, v - PubMed
  12. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;56(6):674-83 - PubMed
  13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):523.e1-6 - PubMed
  14. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Aug;5(8):802-7 - PubMed
  15. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;30(9):2030-3 - PubMed
  16. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Mar;29(3):348-51; discussion 352 - PubMed
  17. Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Jul;13(4):430-1 - PubMed
  18. CMAJ. 2005 Oct 11;173(8):905-12 - PubMed
  19. J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Jul;32(7):1181-7 - PubMed
  20. Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):41-5 - PubMed
  21. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;8(4):331-6 - PubMed
  22. Am J Emerg Med. 1999 Nov;17(7):642-6 - PubMed
  23. Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jul;18(4):408-17 - PubMed
  24. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Sep;11(9):912-7 - PubMed
  25. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Mar;29(3):338-47 - PubMed

Publication Types