Display options
Share it on

Front Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 08;7:133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00133. eCollection 2016.

Bilateral Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex Reduces Cocaine Intake: A Pilot Study.

Frontiers in psychiatry

Corinna Bolloni, Riccardo Panella, Mariano Pedetti, Anna Grazia Frascella, Cristiana Gambelunghe, Tommaso Piccoli, Giuseppe Maniaci, Anna Brancato, Carla Cannizzaro, Marco Diana

Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy.
  2. Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience 'G. Minardi', University of Sassari , Sassari , Italy.
  3. Ser.T, 'Health's House n.1', A.S.L. No. 1 Umbria , Perugia , Italy.
  4. Legal Medicine, Forensic Science and Sports Medicine Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia , Perugia , Italy.
  5. Department of Health Promotion and Maternal Care 'G. D'Alessandro' University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy.
  6. Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience 'G. Minardi', Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari , Sassari , Italy.

PMID: 27551268 PMCID: PMC4976094 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00133

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic cocaine consumption is associated with a decrease in mesolimbic dopamine transmission that maintains drug intake. transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is gaining reliability, a useful therapeutic tool in drug addiction, since it can modulate cortico-limbic activity resulting in reduction of drug craving.

AIMS: In the present study, we investigated the therapeutic effect of bilateral TMS of prefrontal cortex (PFC) in reducing cocaine intake, in a sample of treatment-seeking patients with current cocaine use disorder (DSM-V).

METHODS: Ten cocaine addicts (DSM-V) were randomly assigned to the active or sham stimulation protocol in a double-blind experimental design. Twelve repetitive TMS (rTMS) sessions were administered three times a week for 4 weeks at 100% of motor threshold, over bilateral PFC. Cocaine intake (ng/mg) was assessed by hair analysis at baseline (before treatment, T0), after 1 month (end of treatment, T1), 3 (T2), and 6 (T3) months later. All subjects received psychological support weekly.

RESULTS: The two-way ANOVA for repeated measures did not show a significant effect of the interaction between time and treatment (F 4,32 = 0.35; p = 0.87). Despite that result indicated no difference in the effect of the two conditions (active vs. sham) along time, a decreasing trend in cocaine consumption in active TMS group (F 3,23 = 3.42; p = 0.04) vs. sham (F 3,15 = 1.88; p = 0.20) was observed when we performed exploratory analysis with time as factor. Indeed, Post hoc comparisons showed a significant reduction in the amount of cocaine detected from the onset to 3 months later (T0-T2; p = 0.02) and to the end of treatment (T0-T3; p = 0.01) in addicts from the active group.

CONCLUSION: Bilateral rTMS of PFC at 10 Hz did not show a significant effect on cocaine intake compared to sham. However, a long-term reduction on cocaine intake in active TMS-treated patients was observed when we considered the time as factor. Further studies are required to confirm these encouraging but preliminary findings, in order to consolidate rTMS as a valid tool to treat cocaine addiction.

Keywords: PFC; cocaine use disorder; dopamine; rTMS

References

  1. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16(19):2159-18 - PubMed
  2. Addiction. 2010 Jan;105(1):49-55 - PubMed
  3. Neuroreport. 2007 Feb 12;18(3):289-92 - PubMed
  4. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;116(4):775-9 - PubMed
  5. Int J Addict. 1992 Jan;27(1):51-69 - PubMed
  6. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Mar;34(4):559-74 - PubMed
  7. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2001;39(4):361-6 - PubMed
  8. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;108(1):1-16 - PubMed
  9. Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Aug 10;189(1-3):24-7 - PubMed
  10. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992 Oct 20;221(2-3):227-34 - PubMed
  11. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-39 - PubMed
  12. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jan 5;86(1):91-4 - PubMed
  13. J Appl Toxicol. 2005 May-Jun;25(3):205-11 - PubMed
  14. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;125(2):336-43 - PubMed
  15. Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6 - PubMed
  16. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1442-4 - PubMed
  17. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Oct 20;12(11):652-69 - PubMed
  18. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;63:101-54 - PubMed
  19. Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Nov 25;154(2-3):96-8 - PubMed
  20. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Oct;1327:79-93 - PubMed
  21. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):217-38 - PubMed
  22. Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct;2(4):188-200 - PubMed
  23. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;164(4):622-9 - PubMed
  24. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Jan;26(1):37-44 - PubMed
  25. Forensic Sci Int. 1995 Jan 5;70(1-3):63-76 - PubMed
  26. Nature. 1997 Apr 24;386(6627):830-3 - PubMed
  27. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(1):163-77 - PubMed
  28. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 May 10;218(1-3):20-4 - PubMed
  29. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 1;76(9):742-9 - PubMed
  30. Am J Addict. 2008 Jul-Aug;17(4):345-6 - PubMed
  31. J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 1;21(15):RC157 - PubMed
  32. Subst Use Misuse. 2013 Aug 7;:null - PubMed
  33. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;24(1):31-8 - PubMed
  34. Front Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 29;2:64 - PubMed
  35. Addiction. 2009 Apr;104(4):653-60 - PubMed
  36. Front Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 03;4:40 - PubMed
  37. Nat Med. 2012 Apr 05;18(4):502-3 - PubMed
  38. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Sep;33(10):2517-23 - PubMed
  39. World Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;14(1):64-73 - PubMed
  40. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106-7 - PubMed
  41. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28;374(4):363-71 - PubMed
  42. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;93(4):283-90 - PubMed

Publication Types