Display options
Share it on

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Oct 20;4(4):e119. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5863.

Text Message-Based Intervention Targeting Alcohol Consumption Among University Students: Findings From a Formative Development Study.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Kristin Thomas, Catharina Linderoth, Marcus Bendtsen, Preben Bendtsen, Ulrika Müssener

Affiliations

  1. Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. [email protected].

PMID: 27765732 PMCID: PMC5095367 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.5863

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drinking of alcohol among university students is a global phenomenon; heavy episodic drinking is accepted despite several potential negative consequences. There is emerging evidence that short message service (SMS) text messaging interventions are effective to promote behavior change among students. However, it is still unclear how effectiveness can be optimized through intervention design or how user interest and adherence can be maximized.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop an SMS text message-based intervention targeting alcohol drinking among university students using formative research.

METHODS: A formative research design was used including an iterative revision process based on input from end users and experts. Data were collected via seven focus groups with students and a panel evaluation involving students (n=15) and experts (n=5). Student participants were recruited from five universities in Sweden. A semistructured interview guide was used in the focus groups and included questions on alcohol culture, message content, and intervention format. The panel evaluation asked participants to rate to what degree preliminary messages were understandable, usable, and had a good tone on a scale from 1 (very low degree) to 4 (very high degree). Participants could also write their own comments for each message. Qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The SMS text messages and the intervention format were revised continuously in parallel with data collection. A behavior change technique (BCT) analysis was conducted on the final version of the program.

RESULTS: Overall, students were positive toward the SMS text message intervention. Messages that were neutral, motivated, clear, and tangible engaged students. Students expressed that they preferred short, concise messages and confirmed that a 6-week intervention was an appropriate duration. However, there was limited consensus regarding SMS text message frequency, personalization of messages, and timing. Overall, messages scored high on understanding (mean 3.86, SD 0.43), usability (mean 3.70, SD 0.61), and tone (mean 3.78, SD 0.53). Participants added comments to 67 of 70 messages, including suggestions for change in wording, order of messages, and feedback on why a message was unclear or needed major revision. Comments also included positive feedback that confirmed the value of the messages. Twenty-three BCTs aimed at addressing self-regulatory skills, for example, were identified in the final program.

CONCLUSIONS: The formative research design was valuable and resulted in significant changes to the intervention. All the original SMS text messages were changed and new messages were added. Overall, the findings showed that students were positive toward receiving support through SMS text message and that neutral, motivated, clear, and tangible messages promoted engagement. However, limited consensus was found on the timing, frequency, and tailoring of messages.

Keywords: SMS intervention; formative research; university student drinking

Conflict of interest statement

PB and MB own shares in and work in a private company that develops and distributes mobile health interventions.

References

  1. Health Psychol. 2014 May;33(5):465-74 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Bull. 1982 Jul;92(1):111-35 - PubMed
  3. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Jun 29;3(2):e73 - PubMed
  4. Addiction. 2012 Aug;107(8):1431-40 - PubMed
  5. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):165-73 - PubMed
  6. Prev Sci. 2015 Feb;16(2):181-8 - PubMed
  7. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:56-69 - PubMed
  8. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Apr 6;140(7):557-68 - PubMed
  9. Alcohol Alcohol. 1996 Nov;31(6):577-82 - PubMed
  10. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Feb 24;3(1):e22 - PubMed
  11. Subst Use Misuse. 2016 Jan 28;51(2):155-64 - PubMed
  12. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60 - PubMed
  13. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Nov;63(616):e768-76 - PubMed
  14. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87 - PubMed
  15. Trials. 2012 Jul 06;13:49 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):673-93 - PubMed
  17. Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-8 - PubMed
  18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1:CD006748 - PubMed
  19. Alcohol Res. 2014;36(1):9-18 - PubMed
  20. J Stud Alcohol. 2002 Sep;63(5):551-8 - PubMed
  21. BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 10;13:949 - PubMed
  22. JMIR Res Protoc. 2012 May 23;1(1):e4 - PubMed
  23. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 05;16(2):e14 - PubMed
  24. Health Educ Behav. 2009 Aug;36(4):724-45 - PubMed
  25. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:151-76 - PubMed
  26. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):156-73 - PubMed
  27. Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;11(1):1-47 - PubMed
  28. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Mar;36(3):552-60 - PubMed
  29. Res Nurs Health. 1995 Aug;18(4):371-5 - PubMed
  30. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:41-8 - PubMed
  31. Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1479-98 - PubMed
  32. Transl Behav Med. 2015 Mar;5(1):45-52 - PubMed
  33. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Dec 21;3(4):e107 - PubMed
  34. Addict Behav. 2010 Nov;35(11):913-24 - PubMed
  35. Addiction. 2010 Nov;105(11):1879-92 - PubMed
  36. Subst Abus. 2015 ;36(4):500-6 - PubMed
  37. Brain Res. 2009 Dec 11;1305 Suppl:S61-71 - PubMed
  38. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Jun 23;2(2):e30 - PubMed

Publication Types