Display options
Share it on

Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct 26;10:204. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00204. eCollection 2016.

Impaired Decision Making and Loss of Inhibitory-Control in a Rat Model of Huntington Disease.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience

Nicole El Massioui, Charlotte Lamirault, Sara Yagüe, Najia Adjeroud, Daniel Garces, Alexis Maillard, Lucille Tallot, Libo Yu-Taeger, Olaf Riess, Philippe Allain, Huu Phuc Nguyen, Stephan von Hörsten, Valérie Doyère

Affiliations

  1. Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (Neuro-PSI), UMR 9197, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Université Paris Sud, Université Paris Saclay Orsay, France.
  2. Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (Neuro-PSI), UMR 9197, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Université Paris Sud, Université Paris SaclayOrsay, France; Neuropsychological Unit, Department of Neurology, CHU AngersFrance.
  3. The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY) New York, NY, USA.
  4. Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of TuebingenTuebingen, Germany; Center for Rare Diseases, University of TuebingenTuebingen, Germany.
  5. Neuropsychological Unit, Department of Neurology, CHU Angers France.
  6. Experimental Therapy, Franz Penzoldt Center, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nürnberg Germany.

PMID: 27833538 PMCID: PMC5080295 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00204

Abstract

Cognitive deficits associated with Huntington disease (HD) are generally dominated by executive function disorders often associated with disinhibition and impulsivity/compulsivity. Few studies have directly examined symptoms and consequences of behavioral disinhibition in HD and its relation with decision-making. To assess the different forms of impulsivity in a transgenic model of HD (tgHD rats), two tasks assessing cognitive/choice impulsivity were used: risky decision-making with a rat gambling task (RGT) and intertemporal choices with a delay discounting task (DD). To assess waiting or action impulsivity the differential reinforcement of low rate of responding task (DRL) was used. In parallel, the volume as well as cellular activity of the amygdala was analyzed. In contrast to WT rats, 15 months old tgHD rats exhibited a poor efficiency in the RGT task with difficulties to choose advantageous options, a steep DD curve as delays increased in the DD task and a high rate of premature and bursts responses in the DRL task. tgHD rats also demonstrated a concomitant and correlated presence of both action and cognitive/choice impulsivity in contrast to wild type (WT) animals. Moreover, a reduced volume associated with an increased basal cellular activity of the central nucleus of amygdala indicated a dysfunctional amygdala in tgHD rats, which could underlie inhibitory dyscontrol. In conclusion, tgHD rats are a good model for impulsivity disorder that could be used more widely to identify potential pharmacotherapies to treat these invasive symptoms in HD.

Keywords: DRL; Huntington disease; decision-making; delay discounting; gambling task; impulsivity

References

  1. Neuroscience. 2013 May 15;238:71-81 - PubMed
  2. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Fall;23 (4):434-41 - PubMed
  3. J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 9;31(6):2197-204 - PubMed
  4. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):617-28 - PubMed
  5. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Mar;49(4):760-6 - PubMed
  6. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1980;280:63-73 - PubMed
  7. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36781 - PubMed
  8. Brain Cogn. 2005 Feb;57(1):1-3 - PubMed
  9. Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Sep 1;17(17):2595-609 - PubMed
  10. J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Aug 30;234:38-53 - PubMed
  11. J Neurosci. 2004 May 19;24(20):4718-22 - PubMed
  12. Science. 2007 Mar 2;315 (5816):1267-70 - PubMed
  13. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Oct;163(3-4):362-80 - PubMed
  14. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Nov;125:249-57 - PubMed
  15. Mov Disord. 2013 Jul;28(8):1104-9 - PubMed
  16. Neuroimage. 2011 Oct 15;58(4):1006-16 - PubMed
  17. J Pers Disord. 2000 Summer;14(2):171-87 - PubMed
  18. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2673-84 - PubMed
  19. Brain. 1980 Mar;103(1):179-210 - PubMed
  20. Psychol Assess. 2002 Sep;14(3):253-62 - PubMed
  21. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Oct 15;66(8):743-9 - PubMed
  22. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec 15;62(12):1341-6 - PubMed
  23. Neurology. 2003 May 27;60(10):1615-20 - PubMed
  24. Behav Brain Res. 2012 Jan 15;226(2):435-9 - PubMed
  25. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Jan;10(1):36-42 - PubMed
  26. Brain. 2002 Aug;125(Pt 8):1815-28 - PubMed
  27. Hum Mol Genet. 2006 Nov 1;15(21):3177-94 - PubMed
  28. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;91(4):458-66 - PubMed
  29. Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jun 30;170(2):257-61 - PubMed
  30. Mov Disord. 2015 Feb;30(2):121-7 - PubMed
  31. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Apr 02;8:103 - PubMed
  32. J Adolesc. 2003 Aug;26(4):475-9 - PubMed
  33. Behav Brain Res. 2016 Feb 15;299:6-10 - PubMed
  34. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Nov;152(4):362-75 - PubMed
  35. J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 15;31(24):8986-97 - PubMed
  36. Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):479-87 - PubMed
  37. Neurobiol Dis. 2006 Jun;22(3):538-47 - PubMed
  38. Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;164(4):1301-21 - PubMed
  39. Mov Disord. 2011 Feb 15;26(3):464-8 - PubMed
  40. Behav Neurol. 2013 Jan 1;27(4):547-57 - PubMed
  41. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1458-63 - PubMed
  42. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 25;45(6):1305-17 - PubMed
  43. Neuroreport. 2011 Oct 26;22(15):753-7 - PubMed
  44. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Feb 15;239:15-26 - PubMed
  45. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 May;9(5):671-80 - PubMed
  46. Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Jun;37(11):1779-88 - PubMed
  47. Behav Neurosci. 2009 Dec;123(6):1353-8 - PubMed
  48. Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Mar 15;12 (6):617-24 - PubMed
  49. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Oct 29;9:280 - PubMed
  50. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010 Sep;69(9):910-7 - PubMed
  51. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:691505 - PubMed
  52. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(4):373-90 - PubMed
  53. J Comp Neurol. 1990 Jul 8;297(2):182-200 - PubMed
  54. Biochem J. 1998 Nov 15;336 ( Pt 1):227-34 - PubMed
  55. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jul 1;60(1):66-73 - PubMed
  56. Neuroscience. 1991;44(1):15-33 - PubMed
  57. Brain Res. 1978 Sep 29;153(3):529-38 - PubMed
  58. Neuropsychology. 2011 Jan;25(1):1-14 - PubMed
  59. Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):65-94 - PubMed
  60. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):375-89 - PubMed
  61. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011 Jan;95(1):92-101 - PubMed
  62. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997 Feb;21(1):150-61 - PubMed
  63. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Feb 1;63(3):301-8 - PubMed
  64. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(8):1112-25 - PubMed
  65. J Neurochem. 2005 Aug;94(3):639-50 - PubMed
  66. Behav Neurosci. 2009 Dec;123(6):1185-96 - PubMed
  67. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;69(11):1758-65 - PubMed

Publication Types