Display options
Share it on

Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Oct-Dec;7(4):475-480. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.194109.

Clinical and radiographic comparison of indirect pulp treatment using light-cured calcium silicate and mineral trioxide aggregate in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial.

Contemporary clinical dentistry

Navya P Menon, Balagopal R Varma, Sureshkumar Janardhanan, Parvathy Kumaran, Arun Mamachan Xavier, Bhat Sangeetha Govinda

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Amrita School of Dentistry, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.

PMID: 27994414 PMCID: PMC5141661 DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.194109

Abstract

AIM: To clinically and radiographically evaluate the reparative dentin formation in indirect pulp treatment (IPT) using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and light cured calcium silicate (TheraCal) in primary molars over a period of 6 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical trial on IPT on 43 primary molars in 21 patients between the age of 4-7 years, divided into two groups: 22 teeth in MTA group and 21 in TheraCal group. Measurement of the variation in dentin thickness was done on the digitalized radiograph at baseline, 3 months and 6 months using CorelDRAW X3 software.

RESULTS: Statistical analysis using an independent

CONCLUSION: Clinically and radiographically, both MTA and TheraCal are good IPT materials. The better handling characteristics and comparable reparative dentin-forming ability of TheraCal make this material an alternative to MTA in pediatric restorative procedures.

Keywords: Indirect pulp treatment; TheraCal; mineral trioxide aggregate; primary teeth; reparative dentin

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12 ):1932-9 - PubMed
  2. Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):213-21 - PubMed
  3. Oper Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):615-25 - PubMed
  4. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Sep;17(5):440-3 - PubMed
  5. Pediatr Dent. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):241-8 - PubMed
  6. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Oct;14(4):351-5 - PubMed
  7. Dent Mater. 2011 May;27(5):407-22 - PubMed
  8. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Jul;3(3):252-5 - PubMed
  9. Prim Dent Care. 2002 Jan;9(1):21-6 - PubMed
  10. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;22(4):278-86 - PubMed
  11. Pediatr Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;25(1):29-36 - PubMed
  12. Dent Today. 2012 Oct;31(10):132, 134-6 - PubMed
  13. Am J Dent. 2010 Feb;23 (1):34-8 - PubMed
  14. J Endod. 2004 Jan;30(1):5-16 - PubMed
  15. Pediatr Dent. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):214-20 - PubMed
  16. Tex Dent J. 2010 Nov;127(11):1175-83 - PubMed
  17. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:181945 - PubMed
  18. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;33(2):104-10 - PubMed
  19. Int Endod J. 2012 Jun;45(6):571-9 - PubMed
  20. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013 Aug;41(8):585-95 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Summer;38(4):333-7 - PubMed
  22. J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7 Suppl):S34-9 - PubMed

Publication Types