Balkan Med J. 2016 Nov;33(6):607-613. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.151638. Epub 2016 Nov 01.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Uterine Zones Related to the Menstrual Cycle and Menopausal Status at 3 Tesla MRI.
Balkan medical journal
Özgür Kılıçkesmez, Zeynep Fırat, Ayşegül Oygen, Duygu Kara Bozkurt, Tevfik Güzelbey, Bengi Gürses, Neslihan Taşdelen
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ?stanbul Training and Research Hospital, ?stanbul, Turkey.
- Department of Radiology, Yeditepe University Medical School, ?stanbul, Turkey.
PMID: 27994912
PMCID: PMC5156455 DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.151638
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffusion and diffusion tensor imaging techniques (DTI) are widely available and used both in central nervous system and body imaging, including gynecological diseases.
AIMS: The aims of this study were to assess the capability of DTI of uterine zones in relation to the menstrual cycle and ascertain the normal apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy values at 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study.
METHODS: A total of 13 young reproductive and 12 postmenopausal healthy volunteers were included in the study. MRI examination included sagittal T2-weighted and single-shot echo planar imaging DTI obtained under free breathing. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the endometrium, junctional zone, and myometrium were determined.
RESULTS: The median (minimum-maximum) FA of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone of the reproductive group were 0.31 (0.260-0.465), 0.42 (0.302-0.664), and 0.58 (0.420-0.745), respectively, in the proliferative phase and 0.26 (0.180-0.413), 0.48 (0.357-0.656), and 0.59 (0.490-0.675)], respectively, in the secretory phase. In the postmenopausal group, the FA values of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone were 0.275 (0.136-0.425), 0.255 (0.191-0.553), and 0.27 (0.129-0.397), respectively. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone of the reproductive group were 1.25±0.254 (0.970-1.463), 1.67 (1.213-1.854), and 1.23 (0.853-1.301), respectively, in the proliferative phase and 1.32±0.283 (1.165-1.706), 1.55 (1.360-1.791), and 1.17 (1.163-1.705), respectively, in the secretory phase. In the postmenopausal group, the ADC values of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone were measured as 1.100±0.192 (0.850-1.302), 1.14 (0.864-1.283), and 1.09 (0.912-1.291). The FA values of the endometrium and myometrium were lower in the secretory phase of the reproductive group, while ADC values were higher. However, both the FA and ADC values were lower in the postmenopausal group.
CONCLUSION: The present study showed that uterine DTI is feasible when used quantitatively. While FA values tend to decrease, ADC values increase significantly in all zones in the secretory phase except the junctional zone. Zonal FA and ADC values of postmenopausal women are lower in comparison to those in young women.
Keywords: Diffusion tensor imaging; fractional anisotropy; menstrual cycle; uterus
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
References
- Cancer Imaging. 2006 Sep 13;6:135-43 - PubMed
- Radiology. 1986 Nov;161(2):459-62 - PubMed
- Acta Radiol. 2012 Jun 1;53(5):586-90 - PubMed
- Acta Radiol. 2009 Apr;50(3):340-7 - PubMed
- J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Dec;34(6):1445-51 - PubMed
- Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):745-60 - PubMed
- AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Jun;146(6):1115-22 - PubMed
- Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1989;8(1):36-45 - PubMed
- Menopause. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4 Pt 1):603-12 - PubMed
- J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun;25(6):1101-12 - PubMed
- Br J Radiol. 2015 May;88(1049):20150043 - PubMed
- Br J Radiol. 2010 Jun;83(990):524-8 - PubMed
- J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Dec;38(6):1494-500 - PubMed
- Eur J Radiol. 2003 Mar;45(3):223-34 - PubMed
- Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1995 May;50(5):385-94 - PubMed
- J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Sep;34(3):616-22 - PubMed
- Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1951-6 - PubMed
- Endocrinology. 2001 Jul;142(7):3142-51 - PubMed
- Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e1009-17 - PubMed
- Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006 Jan;288(1):84-90 - PubMed
- J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):54-9 - PubMed
Publication Types