Display options
Cite
Amichay G, Ariel G, Ayali A. The effect of changing topography on the coordinated marching of locust nymphs. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2742doi: 10.7717/peerj.2742.
Amichay, G., Ariel, G., & Ayali, A. (2016). The effect of changing topography on the coordinated marching of locust nymphs. PeerJ, 4e2742. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2742
Amichay, Guy, et al. "The effect of changing topography on the coordinated marching of locust nymphs." PeerJ vol. 4 (2016): e2742. doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2742
Amichay G, Ariel G, Ayali A. The effect of changing topography on the coordinated marching of locust nymphs. PeerJ. 2016 Dec 13;4:e2742. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2742. eCollection 2016. PMID: 27994966; PMCID: PMC5157191.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

PeerJ. 2016 Dec 13;4:e2742. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2742. eCollection 2016.

The effect of changing topography on the coordinated marching of locust nymphs.

PeerJ

Guy Amichay, Gil Ariel, Amir Ayali

Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Current affiliation:  The Department of Collective Behaviour at the University of Konstanz/Max Planck Institute of Ornithology, Konstanz, Germany.
  2. Department of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat Gan , Israel.
  3. Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

PMID: 27994966 PMCID: PMC5157191 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2742

Abstract

Collective motion has traditionally been studied in the lab in homogeneous, obstacle-free environments, with little work having been conducted with changing landscapes or topography. Here, the impact of spatial heterogeneity on the collective motion exhibited by marching desert locust nymphs was studied under controlled lab conditions. Our experimental circular arenas, incorporating a funnel-like narrowing followed by re-widening, did not constitute a major barrier to the locusts but, rather, mimicked a changing topography in the natural environment. We examined its effects on macroscopic features of the locust collective behavior, as well as the any changes in their marching kinematics. A major finding was that of the limited extent to which the changing topography affected system-level features of the marching locust group, such as the order parameter and the fraction of walking individuals, despite increased crowding at the funnel. Overall, marching kinematics was also very little affected, suggesting that locust marching bands adjust to the environment, with little effect on the overall dynamics of the group. These findings are in contrast to recent theoretical results predicting that environmental heterogeneities qualitatively alter the dynamics of collectively moving particles; and highlight the crucial role of rapid individual plasticity and adaptability in the dynamics of flocks and swarms. Our study has revealed other important features of the marching behavior of the desert locust in addition to its robustness: the locusts demonstrated both, clear thigmotaxis and a tendency to spread-out and fill the available space.

Keywords: Collective motion; Environmental effects; Locust marching bands; Schistocerca gregaria; Spatial heterogeneity; Swarming; Topological changes

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

References

  1. J Theor Biol. 2003 Dec 21;225(4):443-51 - PubMed
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1951 May;235(625):163-290 - PubMed
  3. Nature. 2004 Mar 4;428(6978):70-3 - PubMed
  4. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 May;85(5 Pt 2):056102 - PubMed
  5. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1996 Aug;54(2):1791-1801 - PubMed
  6. Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Nov 11;95(20):204501 - PubMed
  7. Science. 2006 Jun 2;312(5778):1402-6 - PubMed
  8. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000 Jan 20;57(1):41-64 - PubMed
  9. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Dec;74(6 Pt 1):061908 - PubMed
  10. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Dec 10;11(12):e1004522 - PubMed
  11. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(5):e1002498 - PubMed
  12. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Sep;7(9):e1002177 - PubMed
  13. Soft Matter. 2013 May 14;9(18):4368-4380 - PubMed
  14. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 02;9(7):e101636 - PubMed
  15. Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Jun 7;110(23):238101 - PubMed
  16. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;81:401-34 - PubMed
  17. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46570 - PubMed
  18. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Jul;90(1):012307 - PubMed
  19. Am Nat. 2002 Mar;159(3):283-93 - PubMed
  20. Phys Biol. 2015 Jun 17;12(4):046008 - PubMed
  21. J R Soc Interface. 2015 May 6;12(106):null - PubMed
  22. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009 May 20;21(20):204107 - PubMed

Publication Types