Display options
Cite
Milillo L, Fiandaca C, Giannoulis F, et al. Immediate . Oral Implantol (Rome). 2016;9(3):123-131doi: 10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123.
Milillo, L., Fiandaca, C., Giannoulis, F., Ottria, L., Lucchese, A., Silvestre, F., & Petruzzi, M. (2016). Immediate . ORAL & implantology, 9(3), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123
Milillo, L, et al. "Immediate ." ORAL & implantology vol. 9,3 (2016): 123-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123
Milillo L, Fiandaca C, Giannoulis F, Ottria L, Lucchese A, Silvestre F, Petruzzi M. Immediate . Oral Implantol (Rome). 2016 Nov 13;9(3):123-131. doi: 10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123. eCollection 2016. PMID: 28042440; PMCID: PMC5159929.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Oral Implantol (Rome). 2016 Nov 13;9(3):123-131. doi: 10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123. eCollection 2016.

Immediate .

ORAL & implantology

L Milillo, C Fiandaca, F Giannoulis, L Ottria, A Lucchese, F Silvestre, M Petruzzi

Affiliations

  1. Private Practice, Bari, Italy.
  2. Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
  3. Dental Clinic of Second University of Naples (SUN), Naples, Italy.
  4. Departimento de Estomatologia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  5. Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM) - Section of Dentistry, University "Aldo Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy.

PMID: 28042440 PMCID: PMC5159929 DOI: 10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate differences in implant stability between post-extractive implants

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were grouped into two different categories. In Group A 10 patients had an immediate post-extractive implant, then a provisional, acrylic resin crown was placed (immediate loading). In Group B (control group) 10 patients only had an immediate post-extractive implant. Both upper and lower premolars were chosen as post-extractive sites. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) was measured thanks to RFA measurements (Osstell®). Five intervals were considered: immediately after surgery (T0) and every four weeks, until five months after implant placement (T1, T2, T3, T4,T5). A statistical analysis by means of Student's T-test (significance set at p<0.05) for independent sample was carried out in order to compare Groups A and B.

RESULTS: The ISQ value between the two groups showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.02) at T1. No statistically significant difference in ISQ was assessed at T0, T2, T3, T4 and T5.

CONCLUSIONS: After clinical assessment it is possible to confirm that provisional and immediate prosthetic surgery in post-extraction sites with cone-shaped implants, platform-switching abutment and bioactive surface can facilitate osseointegration, reducing healing time.

Keywords: immediate loading; implants stability quotient; post-extractive implants

References

  1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):855-60 - PubMed
  2. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014 Apr 04;6(3):63-6 - PubMed
  3. Med Sci Law. 2013 Jan;53(1):19-23 - PubMed
  4. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):581-4 - PubMed
  5. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Feb;15(1):130-42 - PubMed
  6. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):234-43 - PubMed
  7. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23 (4):753-8 - PubMed
  8. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2008 Jul;1(2):50-5 - PubMed
  9. J Oral Implantol. 2005;31(1):25-31 - PubMed
  10. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Summer;43(2):192-203 - PubMed
  11. J Biomech. 2009 Jul 22;42(10):1533-8 - PubMed
  12. J Periodontol. 2005 Jul;76(7):1066-71 - PubMed
  13. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):428-34 - PubMed
  14. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):641-51 - PubMed
  15. Dent Traumatol. 2011 Feb;27(1):40-5 - PubMed
  16. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2008 Oct;1(3-4):104-15 - PubMed
  17. Dent Clin North Am. 2006 Jul;50(3):323-38, v - PubMed
  18. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):275-81 - PubMed
  19. Biomaterials. 1999 Dec;20(23-24):2311-21 - PubMed
  20. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):995-1000 - PubMed
  21. Bone. 2007 Apr;40(4):919-30 - PubMed
  22. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Apr;16(2):161-7 - PubMed
  23. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2012 Apr;5(2-3):42-6 - PubMed
  24. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Mar-Apr;14(2):210-6 - PubMed
  25. Med Sci Law. 2010 Jul;50(3):122-5 - PubMed
  26. J Prosthodont. 2008 Oct;17(7):576-81 - PubMed
  27. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014 Dec 27;7(2):46-50 - PubMed
  28. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2013 Apr-Jun;27(2):531-41 - PubMed
  29. Oral Health. 1993 Jul;83(7):23-4, 27-8, 31 passim - PubMed
  30. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1135-40 - PubMed
  31. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):565-74 - PubMed
  32. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):623-30 - PubMed
  33. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2010 Oct;3(4):15-24 - PubMed
  34. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):425-31 - PubMed
  35. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD004970 - PubMed
  36. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Spring;6(1):24-8 - PubMed
  37. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):529-39 - PubMed
  38. J Forensic Sci. 2012 Nov;57(6):1656-8 - PubMed
  39. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2012 Jan-Mar;26(1):89-96 - PubMed
  40. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):295-304 - PubMed

Publication Types