Display options
Share it on

World J Hepatol. 2017 Jan 18;9(2):106-113. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i2.106.

Vasopressin use in critically ill cirrhosis patients with catecholamine-resistant septic shock: The CVICU cohort.

World journal of hepatology

Lukasz A Myc, Jonathan G Stine, Rinita Chakrapani, Alexandra Kadl, Curtis K Argo

Affiliations

  1. Lukasz A Myc, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.

PMID: 28144392 PMCID: PMC5241528 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i2.106

Abstract

AIM: To examine patient-centered outcomes with vasopressin (AVP) use in patients with cirrhosis with catecholamine-refractory septic shock.

METHODS: We conducted a single center, retrospective cohort study enrolling adult patients with cirrhosis treated for catecholamine-resistant septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU) from March 2011 through December 2013. Other etiologies of shock were excluded. Multivariable regression models were constructed for seven and 28-d mortality comparing AVP as a second-line therapy to a group of all other vasoactive agents.

RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients with cirrhosis were treated for catecholamine-resistant septic shock; 21 received AVP while the remaining 24 received another agent [phenylephrine (10), dopamine (6), norepinephrine (4), dobutamine (2), milrinone (2)]. In general, no significant differences in baseline demographics, etiology of cirrhosis, laboratory values, vital signs or ICU mortality/severity of illness scores were observed with the exception of higher MELD scores in the AVP group (32.4, 95%CI: 28.6-36.2

CONCLUSION: AVP is similar in terms of patient centered outcomes of seven and 28-d mortality, in comparison to all other vasopressors when used as a second line vasoactive agent in catecholamine resistant septic shock. Large-scale prospective study would help to refine current consensus standards and provide further support to our findings.

Keywords: Hepatology; Intensive care unit; Liver; Portal hypertension; Vasopressor

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: We have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87 - PubMed
  2. CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):1971-7 - PubMed
  3. Hepatology. 1989 Mar;9(3):427-32 - PubMed
  4. Hepatology. 2001 Feb;33(2):464-70 - PubMed
  5. Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2659-66 - PubMed
  6. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):811-8 - PubMed
  7. Shock. 2004 Oct;22(4):314-9 - PubMed
  8. Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;25(8):1279-82 - PubMed
  9. JAMA. 2013 Oct 23;310(16):1683-91 - PubMed
  10. Hepatology. 2006 Nov;44(5):1288-95 - PubMed
  11. Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1752-8 - PubMed
  12. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Aug;25(4):665-70 - PubMed
  13. Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1897-902 - PubMed
  14. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1666-75 - PubMed
  15. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Sep;33(9):1669-70 - PubMed
  16. Lancet. 2002 Apr 6;359(9313):1209-10 - PubMed
  17. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):746-50 - PubMed
  18. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Feb;34(2):390-1 - PubMed
  19. J Hepatol. 2016 Mar;64(3):717-35 - PubMed
  20. Circulation. 1997 Mar 4;95(5):1122-5 - PubMed
  21. Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2600-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support