Display options
Share it on

R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Dec 21;3(12):160753. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160753. eCollection 2016 Dec.

Paradigm shifts and the interplay between state, business and civil sectors.

Royal Society open science

Sara Encarnação, Fernando P Santos, Francisco C Santos, Vered Blass, Jorge M Pacheco, Juval Portugali

Affiliations

  1. ESLab Environmental Simulation Laboratory, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; ATP-group, 1649-003 Lisboa Codex, Portugal; Interdisciplinary Centre of Social Sciences-CICS.NOVA-FCSH/UNL, Avenida de Berna, 26-C, 1069-061 Lisboa, Portugal; INESC-ID and Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, IST-Taguspark, 2744-016 Porto Salvo, Portugal.
  2. ATP-group, 1649-003 Lisboa Codex, Portugal; INESC-ID and Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, IST-Taguspark, 2744-016 Porto Salvo, Portugal.
  3. Coller School of Management , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv 69978 , Israel.
  4. ATP-group, 1649-003 Lisboa Codex, Portugal; Centro de Biologia Molecular e Ambiental and Departamento de Matemática e Aplicações, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
  5. ESLab Environmental Simulation Laboratory , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv 69978 , Israel.

PMID: 28083113 PMCID: PMC5210695 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160753

Abstract

The recent rise of the civil sector as a main player of socio-political actions, next to public and private sectors, has largely increased the complexity underlying the interplay between different sectors of our society. From urban planning to global governance, analysis of these complex interactions requires new mathematical and computational approaches. Here, we develop a novel framework, grounded on evolutionary game theory, to envisage situations in which each of these sectors is confronted with the dilemma of deciding between maintaining a

Keywords: complexity; evolutionary dynamics; governance; multiple sectors; policy

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2;102(31):10797-800 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17356-62 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 25;104(39):15188-93 - PubMed
  4. J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:152-61 - PubMed
  5. Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):721-3 - PubMed
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 11;111(6):2212-6 - PubMed
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111 Suppl 3:10838-45 - PubMed
  8. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Nov 13;10(11):e1003945 - PubMed
  9. J Math Biol. 2012 Apr;64(5):803-27 - PubMed
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):665-8 - PubMed
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 13;112(41):12543-4 - PubMed
  12. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Jul;74(1 Pt 1):011909 - PubMed
  13. Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):893-5 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 27;111(21):7576-81 - PubMed
  15. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):315-21 - PubMed
  16. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jan 25;12(1):e1004709 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10421-5 - PubMed

Publication Types