Display options
Share it on

J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):ZC10-ZC14. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20373.8788. Epub 2016 Nov 01.

Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study.

Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR

Mayuri Biccodu Shivashankar, Nandini Thippannanavar Niranjan, Arun Jayasheel, Mallikarjun Goud Kenchanagoudra

Affiliations

  1. Senior Dental Health Officer, Government Hospital , Tumukur, Karnataka, India .
  2. Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital , Davangere, Karnataka, India .
  3. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital , Davangere, Karnataka, India .
  4. Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital , Davangere, Karnataka, India .

PMID: 28050495 PMCID: PMC5198448 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20373.8788

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Complete cleaning and shaping of root canal system is of paramount importance to achieve a successful root canal treatment. There are various rotary Ni-Ti systems available in the market to achieve mechanical goal of root canal preparation. But aggressive preparation of root canal with such systems would result in canal transportation and excess root dentin removal that would be one of the major reasons to decide the prognosis of root canal treated tooth.

AIM: The present study was conducted to compare the root canal preparation in terms of canal transportation and volumetric changes in the root canal dentin among three Ni-Ti file systems, namely Mtwo, ProTaper (PT) and ProTaper NEXT (PTN) file system, using Computed Tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 mesiobuccal root canals of extracted first molar teeth with completely formed root apices and angle of curvature ranging between 10°- 35° were selected. These teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups containing 15 teeth each, based on rotary system used. Group-I: Mtwo files, Group-II: PT files and Group-III: PTN files. Pre-instrumentation CT images were obtained at three cross-sectional planes - 3mm, 7mm and 11mm from apical end of the root. Similarly, post-instrumentation images were obtained. Shortest distance from the edge of the canal to the periphery of the root was analyzed by using Analysis of Variance.

RESULTS: All three file systems tested in the present study presented similar behaviour with respect to the root canal transportation. Lesser canal transportation was recorded in Mtwo. But no statistically significant difference was seen in terms of canal transportation and volume of dentin removed between all three rotary systems (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION: Mtwo, PT and PTN rotary systems have similar behaviour with respect to canal transportation and volume of dentin removed.

Keywords: 3D imaging; Ni-Ti file system; Root canal treatment

References

  1. J Endod. 2011 Aug;37(8):1143-6 - PubMed
  2. Int Endod J. 2003 Feb;36(2):86-92 - PubMed
  3. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Feb;111(2):244-50 - PubMed
  4. Int Endod J. 1999 May;32(3):155-64 - PubMed
  5. Int Endod J. 2005 Oct;38(10 ):743-52 - PubMed
  6. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):57-61 - PubMed
  7. J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):852-6 - PubMed
  8. Int Endod J. 2003 Feb;36(2):93-9 - PubMed
  9. Int Endod J. 2000 May;33(3):255-61 - PubMed
  10. J Endod. 1996 Jul;22(7):369-75 - PubMed
  11. Int Endod J. 2001 Apr;34(3):250-9 - PubMed
  12. Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):476-84 - PubMed
  13. J Endod. 2007 Dec;33(12 ):1455-9 - PubMed
  14. J Endod. 2010 May;36(5):904-7 - PubMed
  15. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972 Oct;34(4):661-70 - PubMed
  16. J Endod. 1975 Aug;1(8):255-62 - PubMed
  17. Int Endod J. 2001 Apr;34(3):221-30 - PubMed
  18. Acta Odontol Scand. 1989 Apr;47(2):117-20 - PubMed
  19. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Sep;2(3):15-22 - PubMed
  20. J Endod. 1996 Dec;22(12):685-9 - PubMed
  21. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jan;13(1):16-22 - PubMed
  22. J Endod. 1991 Nov;17 (11):570-2 - PubMed
  23. J Endod. 2004 Aug;30(8):559-67 - PubMed
  24. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971 Aug;32(2):271-5 - PubMed
  25. J Endod. 1999 Jun;25(6):446-50 - PubMed

Publication Types