Display options
Share it on

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Dec 15;4(1):1266. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1266. eCollection 2016.

Monitoring Prevalence, Treatment, and Control of Metabolic Conditions in New York City Adults Using 2013 Primary Care Electronic Health Records: A Surveillance Validation Study.

EGEMS (Washington, DC)

Lorna E Thorpe, Katharine H McVeigh, Sharon Perlman, Pui Ying Chan, Katherine Bartley, Lauren Schreibstein, Jesica Rodriguez-Lopez, Remle Newton-Dame

Affiliations

  1. NYU School of Medicine Department of Population Health.
  2. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
  3. Formerly New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
  4. CUNY School of Public Health.

PMID: 28154836 PMCID: PMC5226388 DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1266

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic health records (EHRs) can potentially extend chronic disease surveillance, but few EHR-based initiatives tracking population-based metrics have been validated for accuracy. We designed a new EHR-based population health surveillance system for New York City (NYC) known as NYC Macroscope. This report is the third in a 3-part series describing the development and validation of that system. The first report describes governance and technical infrastructure underlying the NYC Macroscope. The second report describes validation methods and presents validation results for estimates of obesity, smoking, depression and influenza vaccination. In this third paper we present validation findings for metabolic indicators (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes).

METHODS: We compared EHR-based estimates to those from a gold standard surveillance source - the 2013-2014 NYC Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NYC HANES) - overall and stratified by sex and age group, using the two one-sided test of equivalence and other validation criteria.

RESULTS: EHR-based hypertension prevalence estimates were highly concordant with NYC HANES estimates. Diabetes prevalence estimates were highly concordant when measuring diagnosed diabetes but less so when incorporating laboratory results. Hypercholesterolemia prevalence estimates were less concordant overall. Measures to assess treatment and control of the 3 metabolic conditions performed poorly.

DISCUSSION: While indicator performance was variable, findings here confirm that a carefully constructed EHR-based surveillance system can generate prevalence estimates comparable to those from gold-standard examination surveys for certain metabolic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS: Standardized EHR metrics have potential utility for surveillance at lower annual costs than surveys, especially as representativeness of contributing clinical practices to EHR-based surveillance systems increases.

Keywords: Electronic health records (EHR); cardiovascular risk factors; chronic diseases; metabolic conditions; surveillance; validation

References

  1. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec 1;156(11):1056-61 - PubMed
  2. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Jan;30(1):164-70 - PubMed
  3. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Jul;3(3):A94 - PubMed
  4. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):57-62 - PubMed
  5. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):345-56 - PubMed
  6. Fam Pract. 2010 Feb;27(1):25-30 - PubMed
  7. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Apr 23;10:23 - PubMed
  8. JAMA. 2010 May 26;303(20):2043-50 - PubMed
  9. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb;26(2):192-6 - PubMed
  10. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e46-50 - PubMed
  11. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):774-9 - PubMed
  12. Prev Med. 2012 Jun;54(6):381-7 - PubMed
  13. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 14;12:116 - PubMed
  14. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E110 - PubMed
  15. South Med J. 2012 Jul;105(7):329-33 - PubMed
  16. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Dec;1(6):e001800 - PubMed
  17. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jan;22(1):300-6 - PubMed
  18. Gac Sanit. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(1):41-7 - PubMed
  19. Heart. 2013 Nov;99(21):1597-602 - PubMed
  20. J Hypertens. 2014 Jan;32(1):65-74 - PubMed
  21. Aten Primaria. 2014 Jan;46(1):15-24 - PubMed
  22. MSMR. 2013 Dec;20(12):16-9 - PubMed
  23. Can J Diabetes. 2014 Jun;38(3):179-85 - PubMed
  24. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Oct;29(10):1341-8 - PubMed
  25. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jul;12(4):367-72 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Nov;16(11):773-81 - PubMed
  27. Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec;49(6):1729-46 - PubMed
  28. Popul Health Manag. 2015 Apr;18(2):79-85 - PubMed
  29. BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 07;14:1157 - PubMed
  30. Am J Med. 2015 Apr;128(4):403-9 - PubMed
  31. Mil Med. 2015 Jan;180(1):83-90 - PubMed
  32. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:345-59 - PubMed
  33. Prev Med. 2015 May;74:86-92 - PubMed
  34. J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Jan;30(1):40-5 - PubMed
  35. CMAJ Open. 2015 Jan 13;3(1):E15-22 - PubMed
  36. CMAJ Open. 2015 Jan 13;3(1):E76-82 - PubMed
  37. Gac Sanit. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):390-2 - PubMed
  38. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):1488-99 - PubMed
  39. Prev Med Rep. 2015 Jul 02;2:580-5 - PubMed
  40. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Apr 28;13:E56 - PubMed
  41. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Dec 15;4(1):1265 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support