Display options
Share it on

Sex Res Social Policy. 2017 Mar;14(1):100-111. doi: 10.1007/s13178-016-0228-y. Epub 2016 Apr 02.

Latent classes of sexual behaviors: Prevalence, predictors, and consequences.

Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP

Rose Wesche, Eva S Lefkowitz, Sara A Vasilenko

Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA.
  2. The Methodology Center, The Pennsylvania State University State College, PA.

PMID: 28163800 PMCID: PMC5283802 DOI: 10.1007/s13178-016-0228-y

Abstract

Scholars of adolescent and emerging adult sexuality have recently begun to study how diverse patterns of sexual behaviors contribute to development and well-being. A person-oriented approach to studying sexual behaviors provides a nuanced understanding of sexual repertoires. The goals of this paper were to document patterns of sexual behaviors ranging from kissing to penetrative sex, and to examine how latent classes of behaviors, gender, and partner type (romantic vs. nonromantic) predict intra- and interpersonal consequences of sexual behaviors. Latent class analysis of a stratified random sample of U.S. college students revealed four classes of sexual behaviors: Kissing Only, Kissing and Touching, All Behaviors, and Oral and Penetrative Only. Compared to individuals in the All Behaviors class, individuals in the Kissing Only class were less likely to experience a positive or a negative intrapersonal consequence of sexual behaviors. Men were less likely to report a negative intrapersonal consequence than women were. Partner type predicted negative interpersonal consequences for the All Behaviors class. Implications are discussed in terms of normative sexual development, prevention, and sexual and relationship education.

Keywords: Sexual behaviors; casual sex; sexual health

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Feb;52(2):228-33 - PubMed
  2. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000 Aug;12(4):308-25 - PubMed
  3. Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Feb;45(2):329-37 - PubMed
  4. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Oct;47(4):389-98 - PubMed
  5. Hum Nat. 2008 Jun;19(2):157-73 - PubMed
  6. J Sex Res. 2014;51(2):131-44 - PubMed
  7. Lancet. 2006 Nov 11;368(9548):1706-28 - PubMed
  8. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007 Jun;39(2):100-7 - PubMed
  9. J Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;148(1):77-89 - PubMed
  10. J Adolesc Health. 2008 Sep;43(3):231-8 - PubMed
  11. J Adolesc Health. 2013 May;52(5):657-9 - PubMed
  12. Psychol Bull. 1993 Sep;114(2):376-90 - PubMed
  13. Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec;40(6):1173-81 - PubMed
  14. J Sex Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;48(6):554-64 - PubMed
  15. Arch Sex Behav. 2004 Jun;33(3):189-95 - PubMed
  16. Struct Equ Modeling. 2015 Jan;22(1):1-11 - PubMed
  17. Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Apr;44(3):705-15 - PubMed
  18. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2014 Summer;2014(144):3-19 - PubMed
  19. J Adolesc Health. 2008 Feb;42(2):170-6 - PubMed
  20. J Sex Res. 2005 Aug;42(3):192-202 - PubMed
  21. Struct Equ Modeling. 2013 Jan;20(1):1-26 - PubMed
  22. J Adolesc Health. 2012 May;50(5):456-63 - PubMed
  23. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;44(4):218-27 - PubMed
  24. J Adolesc Res. 2015 Sep 1;30(5):586-606 - PubMed
  25. Arch Sex Behav. 2015 May;44(4):945-59 - PubMed
  26. Soc Curr. 2015 Jun;2(2):163-181 - PubMed
  27. Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Oct;43(7):1327-41 - PubMed
  28. Arch Sex Behav. 2015 May;44(4):935-43 - PubMed
  29. J Sex Res. 2006 Aug;43(3):255-67 - PubMed
  30. Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Spring;9(2):291-319 - PubMed
  31. Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14(4):671-694 - PubMed
  32. J Adolesc. 2011 Jun;34(3):589-92 - PubMed
  33. J Adolesc. 2011 Aug;34(4):727-35 - PubMed
  34. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010 Jun;15(3):177-85 - PubMed
  35. Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;26(1):60-7 - PubMed
  36. J Sex Res. 2012;49(6):558-69 - PubMed
  37. J Sex Res. 2014;51(1):43-51 - PubMed
  38. Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Nov;42(8):1415-23 - PubMed
  39. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Oct;39(5):1105-19 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support