Display options
Share it on

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jan 12;10:695. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00695. eCollection 2016.

Cerebellar tDCS: A Novel Approach to Augment Language Treatment Post-stroke.

Frontiers in human neuroscience

Rajani Sebastian, Sadhvi Saxena, Kyrana Tsapkini, Andreia V Faria, Charltien Long, Amy Wright, Cameron Davis, Donna C Tippett, Antonios P Mourdoukoutas, Marom Bikson, Pablo Celnik, Argye E Hillis

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA.
  2. Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA.
  3. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA.
  4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY New York, NY, USA.
  5. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA.
  6. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MD, USA; Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, MD, USA.

PMID: 28127284 PMCID: PMC5226957 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00695

Abstract

People with post-stroke aphasia may have some degree of chronic deficit for which current rehabilitative treatments are variably effective. Accumulating evidence suggests that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may be useful for enhancing the effects of behavioral aphasia treatment. However, it remains unclear which brain regions should be stimulated to optimize effects on language recovery. Here, we report on the therapeutic potential of right cerebellar tDCS in augmenting language recovery in SMY, who sustained bilateral MCA infarct resulting in aphasia and anarthria. We investigated the effects of 15 sessions of anodal cerebellar tDCS coupled with spelling therapy using a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled within-subject crossover trial. We also investigated changes in functional connectivity using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging before and 2 months post-treatment. Both anodal and sham treatments resulted in improved spelling to dictation for trained and untrained words immediately after and 2 months post-treatment. However, there was greater improvement with tDCS than with sham, especially for untrained words. Further, generalization to written picture naming was only noted during tDCS but not with sham. The resting state functional connectivity data indicate that improvement in spelling was accompanied by an increase in cerebro-cerebellar network connectivity. These results highlight the therapeutic potential of right cerebellar tDCS to augment spelling therapy in an individual with large bilateral chronic strokes.

Keywords: aphasia; cerebellar tDCS; resting state fMRI; spelling therapy; stroke

References

  1. Neurocase. 2015 Feb;21(1):109-19 - PubMed
  2. Arch Neurol. 1991 Nov;48(11):1178-87 - PubMed
  3. J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 6;26(36):9107-16 - PubMed
  4. J Neurosci. 2014 Apr 2;34(14):5029-37 - PubMed
  5. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016 May 11;34(4):473-89 - PubMed
  6. Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):90-101 - PubMed
  7. Cerebellum. 2014 Jun;13(3):386-410 - PubMed
  8. Science. 1994 Oct 21;266(5184):458-61 - PubMed
  9. Neuroscientist. 2016 Feb;22(1):83-97 - PubMed
  10. Neuron. 2010 Apr 29;66(2):198-204 - PubMed
  11. Cortex. 2015 Feb;63:296-316 - PubMed
  12. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):649-53 - PubMed
  13. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016 May 24;34(4):491-505 - PubMed
  14. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(4):536-45 - PubMed
  15. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Feb;35(2):593-615 - PubMed
  16. Brain Stimul. 2012 Apr;5(2):84-94 - PubMed
  17. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(2):367-79 - PubMed
  18. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 13;39(1):141-52 - PubMed
  19. Eur Neurol. 1997;37(2):82-9 - PubMed
  20. J Neurol Sci. 1996 Dec;144(1-2):34-43 - PubMed
  21. Stroke. 2011 Mar;42(3):819-21 - PubMed
  22. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Aug;21(8):1761-70 - PubMed
  23. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 14;8:785 - PubMed
  24. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2309-23 - PubMed
  25. Cortex. 2010 Jul-Aug;46(7):858-68 - PubMed
  26. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 01;(6):CD000425 - PubMed
  27. Cortex. 2010 Jul-Aug;46(7):869-79 - PubMed
  28. Brain Lang. 2013 Dec;127(3):334-42 - PubMed
  29. Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):489-501 - PubMed
  30. Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1229-36 - PubMed
  31. Cerebellum. 2013 Aug;12(4):485-92 - PubMed
  32. Aphasiology. 2014;28(8-9):1112-1130 - PubMed
  33. Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1560-70 - PubMed
  34. Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct;2(4):201-7, 207.e1 - PubMed
  35. Behav Neurosci. 1989 Oct;103(5):998-1008 - PubMed
  36. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support