SICOT J. 2017;3:4. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2016039. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
Morphological classification of acromial spur: correlation between Rockwood tilt view and arthroscopic finding.
SICOT-J
Pinkawas Kongmalai, Adinun Apivatgaroon, Bancha Chernchujit
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Paholyothin Road, Khlong Luang, Rangsit, Pathum Thani 12121, Thailand.
PMID: 28074776
PMCID: PMC5225834 DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2016039
Abstract
Purpose and hypothesis: Acromion spur is the extrinsic factor for impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tear. The Rockwood tilt view can be used to evaluate prominence of the anterior acromion, however no study has shown the correlation of findings between the Rockwood tilt view and the arthroscopic finding.
METHODS: We developed the arthroscopic classification of acromion spur as type 1 flat spur, type 2 bump spur, type 3 heel spur, type 4 keel spur, and type 5 irregular spur. Patients with rotator cuff syndrome who underwent arthroscopic surgery were recruited. Two observers were asked to classify the type of spur from arthroscopic findings and Rockwood tilt views separately in random pattern. The prevalence of supraspinatus tendon tear was also recorded as no tear, partial-thickness tear, and full-thickness tear.
RESULTS: The keel spur (33.9%) was the most common finding followed by the heel spur (27.8%). The correlation was high especially for the heel, the keel, and the irregular spur (75.47%, 74.03%, and 72.73%, respectively.) These three types of spurs have a high prevalence of full thickness of supraspinatus tendon tear.
CONCLUSION: The Rockwood tilt view can be used to evaluate the morphology of an acromion spur, especially the at-risk spur that correlates highly with the full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear. The arthroscopic classification will also be a useful tool to improve communication between the surgeon and the guide for appropriate treatment in a rotator cuff tear patient when encountering the heel, keel, and irregular spur.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017.
References
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;10(4):309-16 - PubMed
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992 Sep;1(5):246-52 - PubMed
- Clin J Sport Med. 2009 Mar;19(2):83-9 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Jan;54(1):41-50 - PubMed
- Radiology. 1993 May;187(2):479-81 - PubMed
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Sep-Oct;4(5):376-83 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Mar;(252):150-5 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;26(6):836-40 - PubMed
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Nov-Dec;4(6):454-61 - PubMed
- Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):178-83 - PubMed
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Nov-Dec;4(6):449-53 - PubMed
- Arthroscopy. 2004 Sep;20(7):744-53 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jun;468(6):1542-50 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Sep;70(8):1224-30 - PubMed
- J South Orthop Assoc. 2003 Spring;12 (1):23-6 - PubMed
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Sep-Oct;10 (5):434-7 - PubMed
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Oct;21(10 ):1289-98 - PubMed
- Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 - PubMed
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997 Jan-Feb;6(1):55-9 - PubMed
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):286-7 - PubMed
- Radiology. 1984 Jan;150(1):29-33 - PubMed
- Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jul;24(7):2200-5 - PubMed
Publication Types