Display options
Share it on

CEUR Workshop Proc. 2016 Aug;1747.

OOSTT: a Resource for Analyzing the Organizational Structures of Trauma Centers and Trauma Systems.

CEUR workshop proceedings

Joseph Utecht, John Judkins, J Neil Otte, Terra Colvin, Nicholas Rogers, Robert Rose, Maria Alvi, Amanda Hicks, Jane Ball, Stephen M Bowman, Robert T Maxson, Rosemary Nabaweesi, Rohit Pradhan, Nels D Sanddal, M Eduard Tudoreanu, Robert J Winchell, Mathias Brochhausen

Affiliations

  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Science, USA.
  2. University of Arkansas for Medical Science, USA; University of Arkansas Little Rock, USA.
  3. University at Buffalo, SUNY, USA.
  4. Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center.
  5. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, USA.
  6. University of Florida, USA.
  7. University of Arkansas for Medical Science, USA; Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute.
  8. University of Arkansas Little Rock, USA.
  9. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, USA.

PMID: 28217041 PMCID: PMC5312685

Abstract

Organizational structures of healthcare organizations has increasingly become a focus of medical research. In the CAFÉ project we aim to provide a web-service enabling ontology-driven comparison of the organizational characteristics of trauma centers and trauma systems. Trauma remains one of the biggest challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Research has demonstrated that coordinated efforts like trauma systems and trauma centers are key components of addressing this challenge. Evaluation and comparison of these organizations is essential. However, this research challenge is frequently compounded by the lack of a shared terminology and the lack of effective information technology solutions for assessing and comparing these organizations. In this paper we present the Ontology of Organizational Structures of Trauma systems and Trauma centers (OOSTT) that provides the ontological foundation to CAFÉ's web-based questionnaire infrastructure. We present the usage of the ontology in relation to the questionnaire and provide the methods that were used to create the ontology.

Keywords: biomedical ontologies; organization; trauma center; trauma system

References

  1. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Feb;202(2):212-5; quiz A45 - PubMed
  2. J Gerontol Nurs. 2000 Jun;26(6):14-28 - PubMed
  3. J Trauma. 2002 Nov;53(5):811-6 - PubMed
  4. JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8 - PubMed
  5. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Oct 02;64(38):1078-82 - PubMed
  6. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Oct 02;64(38):1074-7 - PubMed
  7. Med Care Res Rev. 2005 Apr;62(2):139-66 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan;23(1):22-8 - PubMed
  9. Database (Oxford). 2012 Mar 20;2012:bar067 - PubMed
  10. J Trauma. 2011 Apr;70(4):970-7 - PubMed
  11. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016 Feb 16;65(2):1-95 - PubMed
  12. J Trauma. 2003 Apr;54(4):663-9; discussion 669-70 - PubMed
  13. J Biomed Semantics. 2013 Oct 08;4(1):23 - PubMed
  14. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):623-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support