Display options
Cite
Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Spagnuolo G, et al. Interface Between MTA and Dental Bonding Agents: Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(1):64-68doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_521_16.
Cervino, G., Fiorillo, L., Spagnuolo, G., Bramanti, E., Laino, L., Lauritano, F., & Cicciù, M. (2017). Interface Between MTA and Dental Bonding Agents: Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 7(1), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_521_16
Cervino, Gabriele, et al. "Interface Between MTA and Dental Bonding Agents: Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation." Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry vol. 7,1 (2017): 64-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_521_16
Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Spagnuolo G, Bramanti E, Laino L, Lauritano F, Cicciù M. Interface Between MTA and Dental Bonding Agents: Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jan-Feb;7(1):64-68. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_521_16. Epub 2017 Feb 21. PMID: 28316952; PMCID: PMC5343686.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jan-Feb;7(1):64-68. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_521_16. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

Interface Between MTA and Dental Bonding Agents: Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation.

Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry

Gabriele Cervino, Luca Fiorillo, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Ennio Bramanti, Luigi Laino, Floriana Lauritano, Marco Cicciù

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
  2. Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Napoli, Italy.
  3. Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University Naples, Napoli, Italy.

PMID: 28316952 PMCID: PMC5343686 DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_521_16

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Nowadays, the material that offers the best sealing characteristic in the field of endodontic treatment is the mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), nevertheless, this material necessities an adhesive bonding agent to perfectly join to the dental surface. The aim of this study was to analyze using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) the possible microgap between the adhesive, MTA, and the dental surface.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen extracted molars were divided into two groups - group A was prepared with MTA-component adhesive and group B was prepared with MTA and composite dual etching. The observations were carried out with a SEM Phenom G2 Pro mode S.E.I. JMP® software was used for statistical analysis, and a

RESULTS: The gap of the areas at higher magnification (1000×) with a size greater than 5 microns in width and 20 microns in length were considered significant, and only group A recorded significant data.

CONCLUSIONS: The SEM analysis performed in the group A with interposition of adhesive and flow between the dental pulp chamber and MTA demonstrates the presence of a marginal gap of considerable amplitude in the all of the samples investigated.

Keywords: Bonding agents; MTA; dental interface; endodontic material

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. J Endod. 1998 Aug;24(8):557-60 - PubMed
  2. Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(6):763-9 - PubMed
  3. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(1):32-41; discussion 42 - PubMed
  4. Int Endod J. 1999 May;32(3):197-203 - PubMed
  5. Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):430-44 - PubMed
  6. J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jan;15(1):80-3 - PubMed
  7. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Mar;16(2):92-8 - PubMed
  8. Dent Mater J. 2015 ;34(4):516-21 - PubMed
  9. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:164065 - PubMed
  10. J Endod. 1998 Aug;24(8):543-7 - PubMed
  11. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):377-80 - PubMed
  12. J Conserv Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):124-7 - PubMed
  13. J Endod. 1997 Apr;23(4):225-8 - PubMed
  14. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Apr;32(4):304-14 - PubMed
  15. J Endod. 1999 Mar;25(3):161-6 - PubMed
  16. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):644-7 - PubMed
  17. Med Eng Phys. 2007 Jul;29(6):671-6 - PubMed
  18. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Dec 5;37(3):432-9 - PubMed
  19. Am J Dent. 2008 Feb;21(1):44-8 - PubMed
  20. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):360-3 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jan;8(1):316-21 - PubMed
  22. Am J Dent. 2009 Dec;22(6):371-5 - PubMed
  23. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Oct;127(10):1491-4 - PubMed
  24. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Dec 01;7(5):e563-8 - PubMed
  25. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Feb;28(2):186-97 - PubMed
  26. Restor Dent Endod. 2015 Feb;40(1):23-9 - PubMed
  27. Scanning. 2016 Sep;38(5):403-411 - PubMed
  28. Dent Mater. 2008 Aug;24(8):1141-7 - PubMed

Publication Types