Display options
Share it on

J Clin Urol. 2016 Dec;9(2):11-17. doi: 10.1177/2051415816656120. Epub 2016 Dec 01.

The role of imaging in the diagnosis of primary prostate cancer.

Journal of clinical urology

Hugh Harvey, Nandita M deSouza

Affiliations

  1. Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, UK.

PMID: 28344811 PMCID: PMC5356180 DOI: 10.1177/2051415816656120

Abstract

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are key imaging modalities in prostate cancer diagnosis. MRI offers a range of intrinsic contrast mechanisms (T2, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS)) and extrinsic contrast-generating options based on tumour vascular state following injection of weakly paramagnetic agents such as gadolinium. Together these parameters are referred to as multiparametric (mp)MRI and are used for detecting and guiding biopsy and staging prostate cancer. Although sensitivity of mpMRI is <75% for disease detection, specificity is >90% and a standardised reporting system together with MR-guided targeted biopsy is the optimal diagnostic pathway. Shear wave ultrasound elastography is a new technique which also holds promise for future studies. This article describes the developments in imaging the primary site of prostate cancer and reviews their current and future utility for screening, diagnosis and T-staging the disease.

Keywords: MR guidance; MRI; Prostate cancer; biopsy; contrast-enhanced; diffusion; elastography; spectroscopy; ultrasound

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicting interests: Professor deSouza is an employee of The Institute of Cancer Research. Professor deSouza has received grants from Cancer Research UK (CRUK), National Institute for Health Researc

References

  1. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Dec;19(6):285-9 - PubMed
  2. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Jun;63(6):1145-56 - PubMed
  3. NMR Biomed. 2014 Jan;27(1):67-79 - PubMed
  4. Clin Radiol. 2015 Nov;70(11):1165-76 - PubMed
  5. Ultrasound Q. 2012 Mar;28(1):13-20 - PubMed
  6. Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57 - PubMed
  7. Korean J Radiol. 2014 May-Jun;15(3):346-55 - PubMed
  8. BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6b):E43-9 - PubMed
  9. Br J Radiol. 2011 Jan;84(997):31-7 - PubMed
  10. Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):122-33 - PubMed
  11. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Sep;10(3):223-32 - PubMed
  12. Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(1):9-18 - PubMed
  13. J Urol. 2011 Mar;185(3):815-20 - PubMed
  14. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Sep;17(3):243-8 - PubMed
  15. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):664-70 - PubMed
  16. Surg Endosc. 2013 Sep;27(9):3280-7 - PubMed
  17. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Jul;33(7):1086-97 - PubMed
  18. Eur Radiol. 2015 May;25(5):1247-56 - PubMed
  19. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 May;94(5):551-60 - PubMed
  20. Phys Med Biol. 2004 Mar 21;49(6):911-22 - PubMed
  21. J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1436-43 - PubMed
  22. Yonsei Med J. 2012 May;53(3):550-6 - PubMed
  23. Biomed Res Int. 2015 ;2015 :571708 - PubMed
  24. Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):207-17 - PubMed
  25. Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):280-9 - PubMed
  26. Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):233-45 - PubMed
  27. Radiology. 2013 Nov;269(2):482-92 - PubMed
  28. J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):794-800 - PubMed
  29. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):596-602 - PubMed
  30. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Oct;84(10):1843-8 - PubMed
  31. Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):159-66 - PubMed
  32. Eur J Radiol Open. 2014;1:22-27 - PubMed
  33. BMC Med Imaging. 2015 Aug 05;15:27 - PubMed
  34. J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):648-58 - PubMed
  35. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Oct;199(4):822-9 - PubMed
  36. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):88-97 - PubMed
  37. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014 Mar;17(1):40-6 - PubMed
  38. Eur Radiol. 2007 Apr;17(4):1055-65 - PubMed

Publication Types