Display options
Share it on

Cardiol Res. 2012 Apr;3(2):54-66. doi: 10.4021/cr121w. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

Treating Refractory Cardiogenic Shock With the TandemHeart and Impella Devices: A Single Center Experience.

Cardiology research

Bryan G Schwartz, Daniel J Ludeman, Guy S Mayeda, Robert A Kloner, Christina Economides, Steven Burstein

Affiliations

  1. Heart Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  2. Department of Cardiology, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  3. Heart Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

PMID: 28348673 PMCID: PMC5358142 DOI: 10.4021/cr121w

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) are routinely treated with intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs). The utility of 2 new percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (PLVADs), the Impella and TandemHeart, is unknown. The objective of this study was to describe the use of PLVADs for patients with CS at our institution.

METHODS: All cases involving PLVADs in patients with CS between between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2010 at a private, tertiary referral hospital were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS: All 76 cases were identified (50 IABP only, 7 Impella, 19 TandemHeart). Most Impella (5/7) and TandemHeart (10/19) patients were initially treated with an IABP before "upgrading" for increased hemodynamic support. All 76 devices (100%) were initiated successfully. Percutaneous revascularization was attempted in 63 patients with angiographic success in 57 (90%). The incidences of major complications were similar between groups, except bleeding occurred less frequently with the IABP. Mean ejection fraction on presentation was 30.4±16.5% and increased by a mean of 6.6±11.4% (P < 0.001). With the institutional approach of treating patients with CS initially with vasopressors and IABPs, then upgrading to an Impella or TandemHeart device for patients refractory to IABP therapy, the overall mortality rate was 40%.

CONCLUSION: The Impella and TandemHeart devices can be initiated successfully in patients with CS, are associated with high rates of angiographic success during high risk percutaneous interventions and may benefit the myocardium during myocardial infarction. Randomized trials are warranted investigating use of the Impella and TandemHeart devices in patients with CS and in patients refractory to conventional IABP therapy.

Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Heart failure; Heart-assist devices; Hemodynamics; Myocardial infarction

References

  1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 4;52(19):1584-8 - PubMed
  2. Eur Heart J. 2009 Sep;30(17):2102-8 - PubMed
  3. Eur Heart J. 2005 Jul;26(13):1276-83 - PubMed
  4. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):625-34 - PubMed
  5. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Mar;57(3):570-5 - PubMed
  6. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 1;82(1):E28-37 - PubMed
  7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):688-96 - PubMed
  8. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(2):91-6 - PubMed
  9. Am Heart J. 2006 Sep;152(3):469.e1-8 - PubMed
  10. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33(2):111-5 - PubMed
  11. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Jul;90(1):80-5 - PubMed
  12. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3 Suppl A):1123-9 - PubMed
  13. Acute Card Care. 2007;9(4):222-30 - PubMed
  14. Circulation. 2001 Dec 11;104(24):2917-22 - PubMed
  15. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3 Suppl A):1063-70 - PubMed
  16. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Aug;22(8):360-4 - PubMed
  17. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 3;47(1):e1-121 - PubMed

Publication Types