Display options
Share it on

Phys Ther Res. 2016 Oct 05;19(1):32-38. doi: 10.1298/ptr.e9904. eCollection 2016.

Cognitive and physical functions related to the level of supervision and dependence in the toileting of stroke patients.

Physical therapy research

Atsushi Sato, Yutaka Okuda, Takaaki Fujita, Norihiko Kimura, Noriyuki Hoshina, Sayaka Kato, Shigenari Tanaka

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy, Yachiyo Rehabilitation College.
  2. Department of Rehabilitation, Tohoku Fukushi University; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences.
  3. Department of Rehabilitation, Chiba minato Rehabilitation Hospital.
  4. Department of Rehabilitation, Yachiyo Rehabilitation Hospital.
  5. Department of Rehabilitation, Gotanda Rehabilitation Hospital.

PMID: 28289579 PMCID: PMC5342960 DOI: 10.1298/ptr.e9904

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify which cognitive and physical factors are associated with the need for toileting assistance in stroke patients and to calculate cut-off values for discriminating between independent supervision and dependent toileting ability.

METHOD: This cross-sectional study included 163 first-stroke patients in nine convalescent rehabilitation wards. Based on their FIM

RESULT: The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the FIM

CONCLUSION: Affected lower limb function, cognitive function, and trunk function were related with the need for toileting assistance. These cut-off values may be useful for judging whether toileting assistance is needed in stroke patients.

Keywords: FIMⓇ instrument; Physical function; cognitive function; toileting assistance

References

  1. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 Dec;16(4):339-51 - PubMed
  2. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(4):288-94 - PubMed
  3. J Gerontol Nurs. 1989 Feb;15(2):9-15 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Nurs. 2004 Oct;13(7):816-24 - PubMed
  5. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jul;81(7):863-8 - PubMed
  6. Stroke. 1984 Sep-Oct;15(5):886-90 - PubMed
  7. Stroke. 1997 Jul;28(7):1382-5 - PubMed
  8. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992 Dec;10(4):284-9 - PubMed
  9. Exp Aging Res. 2005 Oct-Dec;31(4):457-69 - PubMed
  10. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Apr;80(4):379-84 - PubMed
  11. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):341-6 - PubMed
  12. Stroke. 2001 Nov;32(11):2602-8 - PubMed
  13. Brain Inj. 2001 May;15(5):443-53 - PubMed
  14. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Mar;83(3):329-33 - PubMed
  15. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 - PubMed
  16. Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1240-5 - PubMed
  17. Acta Paediatr. 2007 May;96(5):644-7 - PubMed
  18. J Rehabil Med. 2003 Nov;35(6):254-8 - PubMed
  19. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jul;27(7):2217-20 - PubMed
  20. Stroke. 1988 Sep;19(9):1101-7 - PubMed
  21. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jan;77(1):10-3 - PubMed
  22. Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2129-33 - PubMed
  23. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Jul;123(13):1668-72 - PubMed
  24. Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):458-72 - PubMed
  25. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129540 - PubMed
  26. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Oct;62(10):1172-81 - PubMed
  27. Stroke. 1992 Apr;23(4):527-31 - PubMed
  28. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Dec;77(12):1226-32 - PubMed
  29. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 May;46(5):577-82 - PubMed
  30. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jan;35(1):102-7 - PubMed
  31. Clin Ter. 2001 Sep-Oct;152(5):291-7 - PubMed
  32. Phys Ther. 2006 Jan;86(1):30-8 - PubMed
  33. Phys Ther. 1994 May;74(5):494-503 - PubMed
  34. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):877-81 - PubMed
  35. Can J Nurs Res. 1998 Summer;30(2):87-117 - PubMed

Publication Types