Display options
Cite
Mayo M, DeForest BA, Castellanos M, et al. Characterization of Involuntary Contractions after Spinal Cord Injury Reveals Associations between Physiological and Self-Reported Measures of Spasticity. Front Integr Neurosci. 2017;11:2doi: 10.3389/fnint.2017.00002.
Mayo, M., DeForest, B. A., Castellanos, M., & Thomas, C. K. (2017). Characterization of Involuntary Contractions after Spinal Cord Injury Reveals Associations between Physiological and Self-Reported Measures of Spasticity. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2017.00002
Mayo, Meagan, et al. "Characterization of Involuntary Contractions after Spinal Cord Injury Reveals Associations between Physiological and Self-Reported Measures of Spasticity." Frontiers in integrative neuroscience vol. 11 (2017): 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2017.00002
Mayo M, DeForest BA, Castellanos M, Thomas CK. Characterization of Involuntary Contractions after Spinal Cord Injury Reveals Associations between Physiological and Self-Reported Measures of Spasticity. Front Integr Neurosci. 2017 Feb 09;11:2. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2017.00002. eCollection 2017. PMID: 28232792; PMCID: PMC5299008.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Integr Neurosci. 2017 Feb 09;11:2. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2017.00002. eCollection 2017.

Characterization of Involuntary Contractions after Spinal Cord Injury Reveals Associations between Physiological and Self-Reported Measures of Spasticity.

Frontiers in integrative neuroscience

Meagan Mayo, Bradley A DeForest, Mabelin Castellanos, Christine K Thomas

Affiliations

  1. The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miami, FL, USA.
  2. The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of MiamiMiami, FL, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of MiamiMiami, FL, USA; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of MiamiMiami, FL, USA.

PMID: 28232792 PMCID: PMC5299008 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2017.00002

Abstract

Correlations between physiological, clinical and self-reported assessments of spasticity are often weak. Our aims were to quantify functional, self-reported and physiological indices of spasticity in individuals with thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI; 3 women, 9 men; 19-52 years), and to compare the strength and direction of associations between these measures. The functional measure we introduced involved recording involuntary electromyographic activity during a transfer from wheelchair to bed which is a daily task necessary for function. High soleus (SL) and tibialis anterior (TA) F-wave/M-wave area ratios were the only physiological measures that distinguished injured participants from the uninjured (6 women, 13 men, 19-67 years). Hyporeflexia (decreased SL H/M ratio) was unexpectedly present in older participants after injury. During transfers, the duration and intensity of involuntary electromyographic activity varied across muscles and participants, but coactivity was common. Wide inter-participant variability was seen for self-reported spasm frequency, severity, pain and interference with function, as well as tone (resistance to imposed joint movement). Our recordings of involuntary electromyographic activity during transfers provided evidence of significant associations between physiological and self-reported measures of spasticity. Reduced low frequency H-reflex depression in SL and high F-wave/M-wave area ratios in TA, physiological indicators of reduced inhibition and greater motoneuron excitability, respectively, were associated with long duration SL and biceps femoris (BF) electromyographic activity during transfers. In turn, participants reported high spasm frequency when transfers involved short duration TA EMG, decreased co-activation between SL and TA, as well as between rectus femoris (RF) vs. BF. Thus, the duration of muscle activity and/or the time of agonist-antagonist muscle coactivity may be used by injured individuals to count spasms. Intense electromyographic activity and high tone related closely (possibly from joint stabilization), while intense electromyographic activity in one muscle of an agonist-antagonist pair (especially in TA vs. SL, and RF vs. BF) likely induced joint movement and was associated with severe spasms. These data support the idea that individuals with SCI describe their spasticity by both the duration and intensity of involuntary agonist-antagonist muscle coactivity during everyday tasks.

Keywords: F-wave; H-reflex; muscle co-activation; muscle spasms; tone; wheelchair transfer

References

  1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;66(2):116-21 - PubMed
  2. Spinal Cord. 2005 Feb;43(2):74-84 - PubMed
  3. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1974 Dec;37(12):1352-60 - PubMed
  4. Brain. 2003 Feb;126(Pt 2):495-507 - PubMed
  5. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):15-9 - PubMed
  6. Spinal Cord. 2005 Jan;43(1):14-21 - PubMed
  7. Paraplegia. 1989 Jun;27(3):222-6 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999 Sep;80(4):373-8 - PubMed
  9. Brain. 2008 Jun;131(Pt 6):1478-91 - PubMed
  10. Muscle Nerve. 2004 Feb;29(2):234-42 - PubMed
  11. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Feb;94(2):567-75 - PubMed
  12. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2007 Feb;189(2):171-80 - PubMed
  13. Muscle Nerve. 2004 May;29(5):615-27 - PubMed
  14. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Mar;88(3):287-94 - PubMed
  15. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Jan;20(1):32-40 - PubMed
  16. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Aug;79(8):959-65 - PubMed
  17. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004 Sep;18(3):144-53 - PubMed
  18. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jul;77(7):713-6 - PubMed
  19. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Jul;105(1):139-51 - PubMed
  20. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Mar;108(3):655-61 - PubMed
  21. eNeuro. 2015 Mar-Apr;2(2):null - PubMed
  22. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1955;260(5):385-415 - PubMed
  23. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18(4):159-63 - PubMed
  24. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jan;86(1):52-9 - PubMed
  25. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1992 Apr;39(4):426-31 - PubMed
  26. J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 1;20(17):6734-40 - PubMed
  27. Nat Med. 2010 Mar;16(3):302-7 - PubMed
  28. Exp Brain Res. 2001 Dec;141(4):446-59 - PubMed
  29. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 May 12;8:36 - PubMed
  30. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Jan;82(1):164-71 - PubMed
  31. Aust J Physiother. 1995;41(3):169-76 - PubMed
  32. J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Dec 15;185(1):165-77 - PubMed
  33. J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):1972-82 - PubMed
  34. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1950 May;86(5):265-90 - PubMed
  35. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Feb;68(1):32-6 - PubMed
  36. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Oct;95(10):1878-1887.e4 - PubMed
  37. Can J Neurol Sci. 1991 Nov;18(4):443-52 - PubMed
  38. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;37(1):41-52 - PubMed
  39. Muscle Nerve. 2003 Jun;27(6):720-7 - PubMed
  40. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;80(2):175-81 - PubMed
  41. Exp Brain Res. 1993;97(1):173-6 - PubMed
  42. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jun;89(3):177-86 - PubMed
  43. Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jul;133(2):233-41 - PubMed
  44. Brain. 1971;94(3):455-70 - PubMed
  45. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;22(5):645-50 - PubMed
  46. Brain. 1994 Oct;117 ( Pt 5):1161-8 - PubMed
  47. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Oct;47(10):1102-8 - PubMed
  48. J Physiol. 2008 Jan 15;586(2):529-44 - PubMed
  49. Nat Med. 2010 Jun;16(6):694-700 - PubMed
  50. Spinal Cord. 2016 Sep;54(9):702-8 - PubMed
  51. Neuroscientist. 2001 Oct;7(5):455-68 - PubMed
  52. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Dec;80(12):1548-57 - PubMed
  53. J Neurophysiol. 2002 May;87(5):2271-8 - PubMed
  54. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jul;96(1):165-74 - PubMed
  55. J Physiol. 2012 Oct 1;590(19):4957-69 - PubMed
  56. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Oct;24(5):747-54 - PubMed
  57. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Jul;71(8):566-9 - PubMed
  58. J Neurophysiol. 1985 May;53(5):1323-44 - PubMed
  59. Spinal Cord. 2005 Oct;43(10):577-86 - PubMed
  60. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):840-7 - PubMed
  61. Am J Phys Med. 1985 Apr;64(2):71-81 - PubMed

Publication Types