Display options
Cite
Helal E, El-Zawahry M, Gouda A, et al. Bone Height Changes of the Mandibular Edentulous Ridge in Screw Retained Versus Telescopic Restorations for Completely Edentulous Patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017;5(1):72-78doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.004.
Helal, E., El-Zawahry, M., Gouda, A., Elkhadem, A. H., & Ibrahim, S. I. (2017). Bone Height Changes of the Mandibular Edentulous Ridge in Screw Retained Versus Telescopic Restorations for Completely Edentulous Patients. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 5(1), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.004
Helal, Eman, et al. "Bone Height Changes of the Mandibular Edentulous Ridge in Screw Retained Versus Telescopic Restorations for Completely Edentulous Patients." Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences vol. 5,1 (2017): 72-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.004
Helal E, El-Zawahry M, Gouda A, Elkhadem AH, Ibrahim SI. Bone Height Changes of the Mandibular Edentulous Ridge in Screw Retained Versus Telescopic Restorations for Completely Edentulous Patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017 Mar 15;5(1):72-78. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.004. Epub 2017 Jan 18. PMID: 28293321; PMCID: PMC5320912.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017 Mar 15;5(1):72-78. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.004. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

Bone Height Changes of the Mandibular Edentulous Ridge in Screw Retained Versus Telescopic Restorations for Completely Edentulous Patients.

Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences

Eman Helal, Mohamed El-Zawahry, Ayman Gouda, Amr Hosny Elkhadem, Samira Ibrahim Ibrahim

Affiliations

  1. National Research Center, Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Cairo, Egypt.
  2. Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
  3. Egypt Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Prosthodontics, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

PMID: 28293321 PMCID: PMC5320912 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.004

Abstract

AIM: This study was established to evaluate the amount of bone height changes in the posterior mandibular area of edentulous patients receiving screw-retained prostheses versus removable telescopic implant overdentures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Every patient received four inter-foraminal implants regarding the mandibular arch and four anterior implants for the maxillary arch, computer guided surgical guides were planned for the insertion of the implants accurately with a flapless technique. Panoramic radiographs were made immediately, six months and twelve months after the prostheses` use proportional area and vertical measurements were applied to determine changes in the bone height of the posterior mandibular edentulous area.

RESULTS: After twelve months, a statistically non-significant amount of bone resorption was reported for both groups.

CONCLUSION: Up to the limitations of this study both treatment options the screw retained and telescopic overdenture can be used for rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients. These cases must be followed for a longer period to have a definite answer regarding their efficiency in the long run.

Keywords: Dental implants; bone height; index area; mandible; screw retained; telescopic overdenture

References

  1. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1991 Feb;20(1):40-2 - PubMed
  2. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):169-74 - PubMed
  3. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215 - PubMed
  4. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):20110429 - PubMed
  5. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1265-72 - PubMed
  6. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010 Jan;7(1):113-29 - PubMed
  7. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:84-98 - PubMed
  8. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:73-86 - PubMed
  9. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(6):291-9 - PubMed
  10. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:124-35 - PubMed
  11. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):401-15 - PubMed
  12. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 31;(7):CD004152 - PubMed
  13. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9 - PubMed
  14. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):76-94 - PubMed
  15. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jun;91(6):532-7 - PubMed
  16. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Feb;20(2):169-74 - PubMed
  17. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):174-95 - PubMed
  18. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:163-201 - PubMed
  19. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):286-91 - PubMed
  20. J Oral Implantol. 2011 Aug;37(4):431-45 - PubMed

Publication Types