Display options
Share it on

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:1100-1109. eCollection 2016.

Adoption of a Nationwide Shared Medical Record in France: Lessons Learnt after 5 Years of Deployment.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium

Brigitte Séroussi, Jacques Bouaud

Affiliations

  1. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR_S 1142, LIMICS, Paris, France; AP-HP, H^opital Tenon, Département de santé publique, Paris, France; APREC, Paris, France.
  2. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR_S 1142, LIMICS, Paris, France; AP-HP, DRCD, Paris, France.

PMID: 28269907 PMCID: PMC5333332

Abstract

Information sharing among health practitioners, either for coordinated or unscheduled care, is necessary to guarantee care quality and patient safety. In most countries, nationwide programs have provided tools to support information sharing, from centralized care records to health information exchange between electronic health records (EHRs). The French personal medical record (DMP) is a centralized patient-controlled record, created according to the opt-in consent model. It contains the documents health practitioners voluntarily push into the DMP from their EHRs. Five years after the launching of the program in December 2010, there were nearly 570,000 DMPs covering only 1.5% of the target population in December 2015. Reasons for this poor level of adoption are discussed in the perspective of other countries' initiatives. The new French governmental strategy for the DMP deployment in 2016 is outlined, with the implementation of measures similar to the US Meaningful Use.

References

  1. Lancet. 2014 Mar 29;383(9923):1101-2 - PubMed
  2. Med Care. 2015 Feb;53(2):184-90 - PubMed
  3. J Patient Saf. 2013 Sep;9(3):122-8 - PubMed
  4. CMAJ. 2014 Oct 21;186(15):E568-78 - PubMed
  5. NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Jan;(143):1-8 - PubMed
  6. Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(2):66-72 - PubMed
  7. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e96-e106 - PubMed
  8. Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:203747 - PubMed
  9. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):707-13 - PubMed
  10. Med J Aust. 2011 Jan 17;194(2):90-2 - PubMed
  11. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 30;18(3):e73 - PubMed
  12. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Mar 22;11:18 - PubMed
  13. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:397-401 - PubMed
  14. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):657-63 - PubMed
  15. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Dec;81(12):821-7 - PubMed
  16. JAMA. 2000 Jul 5;284(1):93-5 - PubMed
  17. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 2;161(11):803-11 - PubMed
  18. Med Law. 2013 Mar;32(1):13-31 - PubMed
  19. BMJ. 2010 Nov 16;341:c5814 - PubMed
  20. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Dec;83(12):889-900 - PubMed
  21. BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765 - PubMed
  22. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e125-38 - PubMed
  23. Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Oct 15;5(4):861-77 - PubMed
  24. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Mar 27;3(1):e18 - PubMed
  25. Inform Prim Care. 2009;17 (3):153-60 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types