Display options
Share it on

Sci Adv. 2017 Mar 01;3(3):e1601895. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601895. eCollection 2017 Mar.

A three-degree horizon of peace in the military alliance network.

Science advances

Weihua Li, Aisha E Bradshaw, Caitlin B Clary, Skyler J Cranmer

Affiliations

  1. LMIB, BDBC and School of Mathematics and Systems Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
  2. Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

PMID: 28275732 PMCID: PMC5332154 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1601895

Abstract

States form defensive military alliances to enhance their security in the face of potential or realized interstate conflict. The network of these international alliances is increasingly interconnected, now linking most of the states in a complex web of ties. These alliances can be used both as a tool for securing cooperation and to foster peace between direct partners. However, do indirect connections-such as the ally of an ally or even further out in the alliance network-result in lower probabilities of conflict? We investigate the extent to which military alliances produce peace between states that are not directly allied. We find that the peacemaking horizon of indirect alliances extends through the network up to three degrees of separation. Within this horizon of influence, a lack of decay in the effect of degrees of distance indicates that alliances do not diminish with respect to their ability to affect peace regardless of whether or not the states in question are directly allied. Beyond the three-degree horizon of influence, we observe a sharp decline in the effect of indirect alliances on bilateral peace. Further investigation reveals that the community structure of the alliance network plays a role in establishing this horizon, but the effects of indirect alliances are not spurious to the community structure.

Keywords: defensive military alliances; international conflict; networks

References

  1. Nature. 2007 Apr 5;446(7136):664-7 - PubMed
  2. Polit Anal. 2013 Oct;21(4):430-448 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 22;112(38):11812-6 - PubMed
  4. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Sep;74(3 Pt 2):036104 - PubMed
  5. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Sep;76(3 Pt 2):036106 - PubMed
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11;99(12):7821-6 - PubMed
  7. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2249-58 - PubMed
  8. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):370-9 - PubMed
  9. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Feb;69(2 Pt 2):026113 - PubMed
  10. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Dec;70(6 Pt 2):066111 - PubMed
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82 - PubMed
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 - PubMed

Publication Types