Display options
Share it on

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Apr;70(2):177-183. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.177. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Value of procalcitonin as a biomarker for postoperative hospital-acquired pneumonia after abdominal surgery.

Korean journal of anesthesiology

Mohamed M Abu Elyazed, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesia and Surgical ICU, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
  2. Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

PMID: 28367288 PMCID: PMC5370307 DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.177

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a common complication after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as early biomarkers for the diagnosis of postoperative HAP after abdominal surgery.

METHODS: This study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing abdominal surgery. White blood cell counts, highest body temperature, and serum levels of CRP and PCT were recorded preoperatively and daily postoperatively until postoperative day (POD) 5. Chest radiography was performed preoperatively and daily postoperatively until POD 5.

RESULTS: HAP was diagnosed in 14% of patients. Regarding the biomarkers studied after POD 1, CRP and PCT were significantly higher in patients with HAP than in those without HAP (P < 0.05). On POD 2, PCT had higher sensitivity and specificity (84% and 72%, respectively) than those for CPR (70% and 60%, respectively). The cut-off value of PCT on POD 2 was 1.4 ng/ml. On POD 3, 4, and 5, the sensitivity and specificity of PCT and CRP were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS: PCT and CRP are accurate biomarkers for early prediction of postoperative HAP after abdominal surgery. The diagnostic ability of PCT was significantly better than that of CRP on POD 2. After POD 2, the diagnostic ability was not significantly different between the biomarkers.

Keywords: C-reactive protein; Pneumonia; Procalcitonin

References

  1. Laryngoscope. 1992 Jan;102(1):45-7 - PubMed
  2. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Dec;22(12):1499-507 - PubMed
  3. Respir Med. 1994 Oct;88(9):665-8 - PubMed
  4. Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839-43 - PubMed
  5. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar 1;171(5):514-7 - PubMed
  6. J Vasc Surg. 1993 Dec;18(6):914-20; discussion 920-1 - PubMed
  7. Intensive Care Med. 1998 Jul;24(7):680-4 - PubMed
  8. Colorectal Dis. 2011 May;13(5):583-7 - PubMed
  9. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Aug;398(6):833-9 - PubMed
  10. Anesthesiology. 2007 Aug;107(2):232-8 - PubMed
  11. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416 - PubMed
  12. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jun;94(6):767-73 - PubMed
  13. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 16;14 :444 - PubMed
  14. J Visc Surg. 2012 Oct;149(5):e345-9 - PubMed
  15. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jan;96(1):74-9 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Invest. 2003 Jun;111(12):1805-12 - PubMed
  17. Burns. 1997 May;23 (3):218-24 - PubMed
  18. Intensive Care Med. 1998 Feb;24(2):185-8 - PubMed
  19. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Sep;13(9):1599-606 - PubMed
  20. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jun;27(6):1074-8 - PubMed
  21. Croat Med J. 2012 Dec;53(6):612-9 - PubMed
  22. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):475-83 - PubMed
  23. World J Surg. 2011 May;35(5):1017-25 - PubMed
  24. Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Apr-Jun;18(2):210-4 - PubMed
  25. Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):458-61 - PubMed
  26. Surgery. 1993 Oct;114(4):815-9; discussion 819-21 - PubMed
  27. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):581-95 - PubMed
  28. Perfusion. 2005 May;20(3):169-75 - PubMed
  29. Respir Med. 2007 Apr;101(4):808-13 - PubMed

Publication Types