Display options
Share it on

Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2017;5(1):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s40136-017-0143-7. Epub 2017 Feb 07.

Salvage Transoral Laser Microsurgery for Radiorecurrent Laryngeal Cancer: Indications, Limits, and Outcomes.

Current otorhinolaryngology reports

J Meulemans, P Delaere, S Nuyts, P M Clement, R Hermans, V Vander Poorten

Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
  2. Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  3. Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  4. Department of Oncology, Section Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  5. Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  6. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

PMID: 28367362 PMCID: PMC5357496 DOI: 10.1007/s40136-017-0143-7

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this report is to identify relevant literature reports on salvage transoral laser microsurgery (TLM); to consider its oncologic and functional outcomes, as well as reported complications; and to address indications and limitations of salvage TLM.

FINDINGS: The weighted average of local control after first salvage TLM was 57%. Repeated TLM procedures for second or third recurrences were required in up to 41% of cases, resulting in a weighted average of local control with TLM alone of 67%. The rate of definite laryngeal preservation was 73%. The ultimate local control rate, including cases that required total laryngectomy, was 90%. The overall complication rate after salvage TLM was 14%.

SUMMARY: Salvage TLM of radiorecurrent laryngeal cancer yields excellent oncologic outcomes. Serious complications are scarce, hospitalization times are short, and functional outcomes in terms of voice and swallowing are favorable when compared to open conservation laryngeal surgery. The key to success is an optimal patient selection.

Keywords: Conservation surgery; Laryngeal cancer; Salvage surgery; Squamous cell carcinoma; Transoral laser microsurgery

References

  1. Head Neck. 2001 Mar;23(3):177-80 - PubMed
  2. Head Neck. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):24-35 - PubMed
  3. J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Oct;127(10):982-6 - PubMed
  4. Laryngoscope. 2006 Mar;116(3):451-5 - PubMed
  5. Head Neck. 2002 May;24(5):456-67 - PubMed
  6. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jan;130(1):84-8 - PubMed
  7. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Jul;258(5):236-9 - PubMed
  8. Head Neck. 2007 Jan;29(1):26-32 - PubMed
  9. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Oct;155(4):606-11 - PubMed
  10. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 May;138(5):606-13 - PubMed
  11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23 (5):1674-83 - PubMed
  12. Head Neck. 2011 Nov;33(11):1638-48 - PubMed
  13. Head Neck. 2000 Aug;22(5):520-3 - PubMed
  14. J Laryngol Otol. 1995 Feb;109(2):111-3 - PubMed
  15. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 Oct;121(10):664-70 - PubMed
  16. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Aug;270(8):2315-26 - PubMed
  17. Head Neck. 2014 Feb;36(2):280-5 - PubMed
  18. Laryngoscope. 1984 Jun;94(6):836-8 - PubMed
  19. Laryngoscope. 1984 Apr;94(4):488-94 - PubMed
  20. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010 Aug;37(4):474-81 - PubMed
  21. Laryngoscope. 2014 Nov;124(11):2561-7 - PubMed
  22. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 Jun;121(6):375-82 - PubMed
  23. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Apr;15(2):82-8 - PubMed
  24. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:175398 - PubMed
  25. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Dec;133(12):1193-7 - PubMed
  26. Oral Oncol. 2011 Apr;47(4):296-301 - PubMed
  27. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012 Aug;32(4):229-37 - PubMed
  28. Head Neck. 2004 Jun;26(6):477-84 - PubMed
  29. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;133(10):1037-43 - PubMed
  30. Am J Otolaryngol. 1993 Mar-Apr;14(2):116-21 - PubMed
  31. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;129(1):44-9 - PubMed

Publication Types