Display options
Cite
Poulin R. Richness, nestedness, and randomness in parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia. 1996;105(4):545-551doi: 10.1007/BF00330018.
Poulin, R. (1996). Richness, nestedness, and randomness in parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia, 105(4), 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330018
Poulin, R. "Richness, nestedness, and randomness in parasite infracommunity structure." Oecologia vol. 105,4 (1996): 545-551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330018
Poulin R. Richness, nestedness, and randomness in parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia. 1996 Mar;105(4):545-551. doi: 10.1007/BF00330018. PMID: 28307148.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Oecologia. 1996 Mar;105(4):545-551. doi: 10.1007/BF00330018.

Richness, nestedness, and randomness in parasite infracommunity structure.

Oecologia

R Poulin

Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.

PMID: 28307148 DOI: 10.1007/BF00330018

Abstract

Within a host population, parasite infracommunities vary in both richness and species composition. If interspecific interactions among parasites are important in shaping infracommunities, the structure of these assemblages is expected to differ from the one predicted by null models, i.e. from the one that would result from chance alone. Using data from the literature, I tested for discrepancies between observed and random patterns in the richness and composition of gastrointestinal helminth infracommunities of birds and mammals. Both the Poisson distribution and a more sophisticated null model, derived from prevalence of the different parasite species in the host population, usually provided a good fit to the observed distributions of infracommunity richness among hosts. This suggests that parasite species do not co-occur more or less frequently than expected by chance. In mammals, the co-occurrence of all available parasite species in the same host individual, or maximum potential infracommunity richness, was less likely to be observed when several parasite species were available; this is also a phenomenon expected from the random assembly of parasite species. Finally, there was no evidence for a nested subset pattern among parasite species in a host population: rate species were distributed independently of common ones. The overall picture emerging from these results is one in which parasite assemblages are more likely to be the product of random events than of predictable and repeatable processes.

Keywords: Helminth assemblages; Nestedness; Parasite infracommunity; Randomness; Richness

References

  1. Oecologia. 1995 Feb;101(2):204-210 - PubMed
  2. Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Feb;9(2):52-7 - PubMed
  3. J Parasitol. 1961 Jun;47:378-90 - PubMed
  4. Can J Zool. 1969 Mar;47(2):167-70 - PubMed
  5. J Parasitol. 1950 Oct;36(5):426 - PubMed
  6. J Parasitol. 1984 Oct;70(5):735-46 - PubMed
  7. Can J Zool. 1978 Nov;56(11):2454-6 - PubMed
  8. J Theor Biol. 1990 Feb 22;142(4):517-29 - PubMed
  9. J Parasitol. 1988 Aug;74(4):628-37 - PubMed
  10. Can J Zool. 1971 Jan;49(1):75-83 - PubMed
  11. J Parasitol. 1985 Apr;71(2):227-34 - PubMed
  12. Oecologia. 1992 Dec;92 (3):416-428 - PubMed
  13. J Parasitol. 1978 Apr;64(2):295-302 - PubMed
  14. Can J Zool. 1971 Apr;49(4):507-12 - PubMed
  15. Oecologia. 1994 Nov;100(1-2):184-189 - PubMed
  16. J Parasitol. 1993 Aug;79(4):610-2 - PubMed
  17. J Parasitol. 1978 Dec;64(6):1149-50 - PubMed
  18. Can J Zool. 1972 May;50(5):633-7 - PubMed
  19. Can J Zool. 1978 Dec;56(12):2614-7 - PubMed

Publication Types