Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Apr 10;11:731-742. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S127612. eCollection 2017.
Complexity of care and strategies of self-management in patients with colorectal cancer.
Patient preference and adherence
Dominik Ose, Eva C Winkler, Sarah Berger, Ines Baudendistel, Martina Kamradt, Felicitas Eckrich, Joachim Szecsenyi
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Population Health, Health System Innovation and Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Program for Ethics and Patient-oriented Care in Oncology, National Centre for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
PMID: 28435231
PMCID: PMC5391842 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S127612
Abstract
PURPOSE: Given the inherent complexity of cancer care, in which personal, social, and clinical aspects accumulate and interact over time, self-management support need to become more comprehensive. This study has the following two aims: 1) to analyze and describe the complexity of individual patient situations and 2) to analyze and describe already established self-management strategies of patients to handle this complexity.
METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted. Ten focus groups were performed collecting perspectives of the following three user groups: patients with colorectal cancer (n=12) and representatives from support groups (n=2), physicians (n=17), and other health care professionals (HCPs; n=16). Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: The results showed that cancer patients are struggling with the complexity of their individual situations characterized by the 1) "complexity of disease", 2) "complexity of care", and 3) "complexity of treatment-related data". To deal with these multifaceted situations, patients have established several individual strategies. These strategies are "proactive demanding" (eg, to get support and guidance or a meaningful dialog with the doctor), "proactive behavior" (eg, preparation of visits), and "proactive data management" (eg, in terms of merging treatment-related data and to disseminate these to their health care providers).
CONCLUSION: Patients with colorectal cancer have to handle a high complexity of individual situations within treatment and care of their disease. Private and social challenges have a culminating effect. This complexity increases as patients experience a longer duration of treatment and follow-up as patients have to handle a significantly higher amount of data over time. Self-management support should focus more on the individual complexity in a patient's life. This includes assisting patients with strategies that have already been established by themselves (like preparation of visits).
Keywords: chronic care; colorectal cancer; complexity; health care utilization; health services research; self-management
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Mar;26(2):null - PubMed
- Lancet. 2014 Sep 13;384(9947):980-1004 - PubMed
- Ann Fam Med. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):15-21 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22 Suppl 3:382-90 - PubMed
- Chronic Illn. 2005 Dec;1(4):315-20 - PubMed
- Chronic Illn. 2007 Jun;3(2):167-75 - PubMed
- Psychooncology. 2016 May;25(5):574-81 - PubMed
- Fam Pract. 2015 Dec;32(6):686-93 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155434 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6 - PubMed
- Int J Cancer. 2015 Jun 1;136(11):2649-58 - PubMed
- Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7 - PubMed
- Psychooncology. 2010 Sep;19(9):909-22 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8 - PubMed
- Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jun;23(6):1679-88 - PubMed
- Cancer Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;38(2):E10-26 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;65(10):1041-51 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2014 Sep 13;384(9947):957-79 - PubMed
- Med J Aust. 2008 Nov 17;189(10 Suppl):S9-S13 - PubMed
- Health Expect. 2014 Aug;17(4):565-78 - PubMed
- Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):37-49 - PubMed
- BMC Public Health. 2013 May 07;13:452 - PubMed
- JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Oct 18;3(2):e25 - PubMed
- J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):981-994 - PubMed
- BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302 - PubMed
- Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Oct 03;10 :2021-2029 - PubMed
- Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24(4):679-84 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 21;17(5):e121 - PubMed
- Br J Cancer. 2011 Nov 8;105 Suppl 1:S21-8 - PubMed
- Health Soc Care Community. 1999 Mar;7(2):120-128 - PubMed
- Ann Oncol. 2012 Feb;23(2):472-9 - PubMed
- Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1759-1771 - PubMed
- Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Aug;51(8):1083-92 - PubMed
- Lancet Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(11):935-43 - PubMed
- Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 - PubMed
- AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013 Dec;27(12):697-706 - PubMed
- Int Nurs Rev. 2011 Sep;58(3):288-95 - PubMed
- Br J Cancer. 2011 Nov 8;105 Suppl 1:S1-4 - PubMed
- Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2613-21 - PubMed
- J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Feb;10(1):206-19 - PubMed
- Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(3):199-206 - PubMed
- CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):50-62 - PubMed
- J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):18-24 - PubMed
- J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Dec;10 (6):1012-1034 - PubMed
- J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Jun;44(2):136-44 - PubMed
- Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Mar;52(3):727-43 - PubMed
Publication Types