Display options
Share it on

Eur J Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):12-16. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_141_16.

Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of selected root canal irrigants on commonly isolated microorganisms in endodontic infection.

European journal of dentistry

Sandeep Dubey, Suparna Ganguly Saha, Balakrishnan Rajkumar, Tapan Kumar Dhole

Affiliations

  1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  2. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  3. Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

PMID: 28435359 PMCID: PMC5379824 DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_141_16

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of three selected root canal irrigants (BioPure MTAD, metronidazole, aztreonam) against microbes commonly isolated from polymicrobial microbiota of root canal infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed with four experimental groups (Group I -

RESULTS: Metronidazole was found to be the most effective root canal irrigant against

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, BioPure MTAD is the most effective root canal irrigant as it has shown an antibacterial effect against all the tested microorganisms. However, metronidazole showed maximum antibacterial effect against obligate anaerobes. Aztreonam also showed an antibacterial effect in the present study, raising its possibility to be used as a root canal irrigant in the future.

Keywords: Agar disc diffusion method; BioPure MTAD; Candida albicans; Enterococcus faecalis

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Int Endod J. 1995 Sep;28(5):244-8 - PubMed
  2. Int Endod J. 1997 Mar;30(2):96-101 - PubMed
  3. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 May;97(5):632-41 - PubMed
  4. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov;22(5):832-8 - PubMed
  5. Indian J Med Res. 2008 Aug;128(2):111-21 - PubMed
  6. J Clin Pathol. 1973 Jun;26(6):393-5 - PubMed
  7. Indian J Dermatol. 2012 Jul;57(4):279-81 - PubMed
  8. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2009 Winter;3(1):24-7 - PubMed
  9. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(2):128-37 - PubMed
  10. Saudi Med J. 2011 May;32(5):479-83 - PubMed
  11. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Aug;11(4):196-200 - PubMed
  12. ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:390526 - PubMed
  13. Iran Endod J. 2009 Spring;4(2):63-8 - PubMed
  14. J Endod. 2007 Nov;33(11):1352-4 - PubMed
  15. Iran Endod J. 2007 Spring;2(1):24-8 - PubMed
  16. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1997 Oct;12(5):318-22 - PubMed
  17. Int Endod J. 1990 Jan;23(1):20-7 - PubMed
  18. Fed Oper Dent. 1990 Dec;1(2):30-6 - PubMed
  19. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Dec;15(6):539-45 - PubMed
  20. Int Endod J. 1998 Jan;31(1):39-47 - PubMed
  21. J Endod. 2003 Mar;29(3):170-5 - PubMed

Publication Types