Display options
Cite
Vansteenkiste K, Van Limbergen T, Decaluwé R, et al. Clinical problems due to encephalomyocarditis virus infections in two pig herds. Porcine Health Manag. 2016;2:19doi: 10.1186/s40813-016-0036-z.
Vansteenkiste, K., Van Limbergen, T., Decaluwé, R., Tignon, M., Cay, B., & Maes, D. (2016). Clinical problems due to encephalomyocarditis virus infections in two pig herds. Porcine health management, 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0036-z
Vansteenkiste, Klaas, et al. "Clinical problems due to encephalomyocarditis virus infections in two pig herds." Porcine health management vol. 2 (2016): 19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0036-z
Vansteenkiste K, Van Limbergen T, Decaluwé R, Tignon M, Cay B, Maes D. Clinical problems due to encephalomyocarditis virus infections in two pig herds. Porcine Health Manag. 2016 Aug 07;2:19. doi: 10.1186/s40813-016-0036-z. eCollection 2016. PMID: 28405445; PMCID: PMC5382511.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Porcine Health Manag. 2016 Aug 07;2:19. doi: 10.1186/s40813-016-0036-z. eCollection 2016.

Clinical problems due to encephalomyocarditis virus infections in two pig herds.

Porcine health management

Klaas Vansteenkiste, Tommy Van Limbergen, Ruben Decaluwé, Marylène Tignon, Brigitte Cay, Dominiek Maes

Affiliations

  1. Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  2. Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Machelen, Belgium.

PMID: 28405445 PMCID: PMC5382511 DOI: 10.1186/s40813-016-0036-z

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infections with encephalomyocarditis virus may cause myocarditis and sudden death in young pigs and reproduction disorders in sows. The presence of encephalomyocarditis virus infected rodents is considered a major risk factor for transmission of the virus to pigs. There is currently no effective treatment. Tightening up biosecurity, applying effective rodent control and reducing stress are the main control measures.

CASE PRESENTATION: Two farrow-to-finish herds suffering from problems with sudden death are presented. In herd A, suckling piglets from 3 to 12 days old were dying acutely whereas in herd B, piglets at the end of the nursery period (8-10 weeks) were showing identical problems. A presumptive diagnosis of encephalomyocarditis virus infection was made because typical lesions were observed in some of the affected pigs. These lesions were not always present in pigs dying acutely or in some cases the lesions were very subtle. Therefore other causes had to be ruled out based upon clinical history, clinical signs and diagnostic tests. A conclusive diagnosis was finally established by showing encephalomyocarditis virus in heart tissue using conventional gel-based polymerase chain reaction tests. The real-time PCR test that gave initially negative result was further optimized to avoid false negative results.

CONCLUSIONS: Typical lesions are not always present in piglets infected with encephalomyocarditis virus, indicating the importance of examining multiple animals. Problems in suckling piglets may occur in affected herds without reproductive problems in sows. Transmission routes of EMCV in swine are not fully understood. A stand-empty period following thorough cleaning and disinfection is recommended for controlling EMC virus infections.

Keywords: Case report; EMCV; Encephalomyocarditis virus; Suckling and nursery pigs; Sudden death

References

  1. Braz J Microbiol. 2009 Oct;40(4):988-93 - PubMed
  2. Vet Res. 2004 Jan-Feb;35(1):113-22 - PubMed
  3. J Virol. 2001 Dec;75(23):11621-9 - PubMed
  4. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Mar 15;19(4):864-9 - PubMed
  5. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1990 Oct;2(4):347-50 - PubMed
  6. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1997 Jul;44(5):281-6 - PubMed
  7. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1993 Jul;5(3):317-21 - PubMed
  8. Vet Microbiol. 1994 Mar;39(1-2):111-6 - PubMed
  9. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1999 May;46(4):217-31 - PubMed
  10. Virol J. 2010 Mar 18;7:64 - PubMed
  11. Can J Comp Med. 1972 Oct;36(4):393-7 - PubMed
  12. Vet Microbiol. 1999 Dec;70(3-4):179-92 - PubMed
  13. Vet Res. 2006 Nov-Dec;37(6):757-66 - PubMed
  14. Prev Vet Med. 2007 Jan 16;78(1):24-34 - PubMed
  15. J Virol Methods. 2002 Mar;101(1-2):197-206 - PubMed
  16. Arch Virol. 2003 May;148(5):903-12 - PubMed
  17. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1991 Oct;3(4):275-82 - PubMed
  18. Vet Res. 2006 Jan-Feb;37(1):15-23 - PubMed
  19. Vet Microbiol. 2002 Sep 24;88(4):301-14 - PubMed
  20. Vet Microbiol. 2004 Apr 19;99(3-4):187-95 - PubMed

Publication Types