Display options
Share it on

RMD Open. 2017 Mar 17;3(1):e000426. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000426. eCollection 2017.

Modified-release prednisone for polymyalgia rheumatica: a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study.

RMD open

Maurizio Cutolo, Michael Hopp, Stefan Liebscher, Bhaskar Dasgupta, Frank Buttgereit

Affiliations

  1. Research Laboratories and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology , University of Genova , Genova , Italy.
  2. Mundipharma Research GmbH & Co. KG , Limburg, Hessen , Germany.
  3. Department of Rheumatology , Southend University Hospital , Westcliff-on-Sea , UK.
  4. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology , Charité University Medicine , Berlin , Germany.

PMID: 28405475 PMCID: PMC5372105 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000426

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of modified-release (MR) versus immediate-release (IR) prednisone in newly diagnosed glucocorticoid (GC)-naïve patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

METHODS: Patients were randomised to double-blind MR prednisone (taken at approximately 22:00) or IR prednisone (taken in the morning), 15 mg/day for 4 weeks. The primary end point was complete response rate (≥70% reduction in PMR visual analogue scale, duration of morning stiffness and C reactive protein (CRP) (or CRP <2× upper limit of normal (ULN))) at week 4. Non-inferiority was decided if the lower 95% confidence limit (MR vs IR prednisone) was above -15%. 400 patients were planned but only 62 were enrolled due to difficulties in recruiting GC-naïve patients with PMR with CRP ≥2×ULN.

RESULTS: The percentage of complete responders at week 4 was numerically greater for MR prednisone (53.8%) than for IR prednisone (40.9%). Non-inferiority of MR versus IR prednisone was not proven in the primary analysis on the per protocol population (N=48; treatment difference: 12.22%; 95% CI -15.82% to 40.25%). However, sensitivity analysis on the full analysis population showed an evident trend favouring MR prednisone (N=62; treatment difference: 15.56%; 95% CI -9.16% to 40.28%). Adverse events were generally mild and transient with no unexpected safety observations.

CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a clear trend for favourable short-term efficacy of MR prednisone versus IR prednisone in early treatment of PMR. Further studies are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number 2011-002353-57; Results.

Keywords: Autoimmune Diseases; Corticosteroids; Inflammation; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Treatment

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MC received grant/research support from Horizon Pharma, is a consultant for Mundipharma International and is on the speaker’s bureau for Mundipharma International. MH is an employ

References

  1. Rheumatol Int. 2013 Jun;33(6):1447-54 - PubMed
  2. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 2011;125:28-39 - PubMed
  3. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Oct;74(10):1799-807 - PubMed
  4. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Apr;71(4):484-92 - PubMed
  5. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;67(10):2569-80 - PubMed
  6. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):26-35 - PubMed
  7. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Jul-Aug;31(4):498-505 - PubMed
  8. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1839-50 - PubMed
  9. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jul;69(7):1275-80 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jul 25;347(4):261-71 - PubMed
  11. Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):205-14 - PubMed
  12. J Rheumatol. 2012 Apr;39(4):795-803 - PubMed
  13. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):943-54 - PubMed
  14. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 16;139(6):505-15 - PubMed
  15. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Jun;39(6):624-31 - PubMed
  16. J Rheumatol. 2010 May;37(5):894-9 - PubMed
  17. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jul 26;18(1):174 - PubMed
  18. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Feb;72(2):204-10 - PubMed
  19. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug 15;55(4):518-20 - PubMed

Publication Types