Display options
Share it on

Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24:ii66-ii75. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052071. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

Changes in use of types of tobacco products by pack sizes and price segments, prices paid and consumption following the introduction of plain packaging in Australia.

Tobacco control

Michelle Scollo, Meghan Zacher, Kerri Coomber, Megan Bayly, Melanie Wakefield

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.

PMID: 28407614 PMCID: PMC4401343 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052071

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe changes among smokers in use of various types of tobacco products, reported prices paid and cigarette consumption following the standardisation of tobacco packaging in Australia.

METHODS: National cross-sectional telephone surveys of adult smokers were conducted from April 2012 (6 months before transition to plain packaging (PP)) to March 2014 (15 months afterwards). Multivariable logistic regression assessed changes in products, brands and pack types/sizes; multivariable linear regression examined changes in inflation-adjusted prices paid and reported cigarette consumption between the pre-PP and three subsequent periods-the transition phase, PP year 1 and PP post-tax (post a 12.5% tax increase in December 2013).

RESULTS: The proportion of current smokers using roll-your-own (RYO) products fluctuated over the study period. Proportions using value brands of factory-made (FM) cigarettes increased from pre-PP (21.4%) to PP year 1 (25.5%; p=0.002) and PP post-tax (27.8%; p<0.001). Inflation-adjusted prices paid increased in the PP year 1 and PP post-tax phases; the largest increases were among premium FM brands, the smallest among value brands. Consumption did not change in PP year 1 among daily, regular or current smokers or among smokers of brands in any market segment. Consumption among regular smokers declined significantly in PP post-tax (mean=14.0, SE=0.33) compared to PP year 1 (mean=14.8, SE=0.17; p=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of PP was associated with an increase in use of value brands, likely due to increased numbers available and smaller increases in prices for value relative to premium brands. Reported consumption declined following the December 2013 tax increase.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Keywords: Advertising and Promotion; Hand-rolled/RYO tobacco; Packaging and Labelling

References

  1. Tob Control. 1999 Summer;8(2):196-201 - PubMed
  2. Health Econ. 2003 Oct;12(10):821-35 - PubMed
  3. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 Nov-Dec;10(6):497-500 - PubMed
  4. Tob Control. 2005 Apr;14(2):86-92 - PubMed
  5. Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun;95(6):994-5 - PubMed
  6. Tob Control. 2005 Jun;14(3):214-5 - PubMed
  7. Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3:iii59-64 - PubMed
  8. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):234-52 - PubMed
  9. Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):172-80 - PubMed
  10. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:406283 - PubMed
  11. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Feb;15(2):444-9 - PubMed
  12. Tob Control. 2012 Nov;21(6):589-92 - PubMed
  13. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 13;13:650 - PubMed
  14. Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(6):501-6 - PubMed
  15. Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e15-6 - PubMed
  16. Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1:i48-53 - PubMed
  17. Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e24-9 - PubMed
  18. Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e116-22 - PubMed
  19. Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3:iii4-iii10 - PubMed
  20. J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Mar;37(1):78-88 - PubMed
  21. Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii9-ii16 - PubMed
  22. Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii17-ii25 - PubMed
  23. Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii76-ii81 - PubMed
  24. Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii82-ii89 - PubMed
  25. Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii90-ii93 - PubMed

Publication Types