Display options
Share it on

Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 05;7:45811. doi: 10.1038/srep45811.

Degradation potentials of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from thawed permafrost peat.

Scientific reports

Balathandayuthabani Panneer Selvam, Jean-François Lapierre, Francois Guillemette, Carolina Voigt, Richard E Lamprecht, Christina Biasi, Torben R Christensen, Pertti J Martikainen, Martin Berggren

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sweden.
  2. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Canada.
  3. Research Center for Watershed ? Aquatic Ecosystem Interactions (RIVE), Department of Environmental Sciences, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
  4. Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Finland.
  5. Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Denmark.

PMID: 28378792 PMCID: PMC5395014 DOI: 10.1038/srep45811

Abstract

Global warming can substantially affect the export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from peat-permafrost to aquatic systems. The direct degradability of such peat-derived DOC, however, is poorly constrained because previous permafrost thaw studies have mainly addressed mineral soil catchments or DOC pools that have already been processed in surface waters. We incubated peat cores from a palsa mire to compare an active layer and an experimentally thawed permafrost layer with regard to DOC composition and degradation potentials of pore water DOC. Our results show that DOC from the thawed permafrost layer had high initial degradation potentials compared with DOC from the active layer. In fact, the DOC that showed the highest bio- and photo-degradability, respectively, originated in the thawed permafrost layer. Our study sheds new light on the DOC composition of peat-permafrost directly upon thaw and suggests that past estimates of carbon-dioxide emissions from thawed peat permafrost may be biased as they have overlooked the initial mineralization potential of the exported DOC.

References

  1. Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;14(6):1432-43 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):13946-51 - PubMed
  3. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Dec 15;44(24):9405-12 - PubMed
  4. Nature. 2013 Nov 21;503(7476):355-9 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110(9):3429-34 - PubMed
  6. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007 Jul 15;365(1856):1657-76 - PubMed
  7. Ecol Appl. 1991 May;1(2):182-195 - PubMed
  8. Microb Ecol. 2010 Nov;60(4):894-902 - PubMed
  9. Chemosphere. 1999 Jan;38(1):45-50 - PubMed
  10. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Aug;20(8):2674-86 - PubMed
  11. Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Oct 15;37(20):4702-8 - PubMed
  12. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Sep 16;48(18):10598-606 - PubMed
  13. Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 24;6:7856 - PubMed
  14. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Sep 2;48(17):10098-106 - PubMed
  15. Science. 2014 Aug 22;345(6199):925-8 - PubMed

Publication Types