Display options
Share it on

Am J Transl Res. 2017 Apr 15;9(4):1720-1731. eCollection 2017.

Medial tibial subchondral bone is the key target for extracorporeal shockwave therapy in early osteoarthritis of the knee.

American journal of translational research

Ching-Jen Wang, Jai-Hong Cheng, Chien-Yiu Huang, Shan-Ling Hsu, Fan-Yen Lee, Hon-Kan Yip

Affiliations

  1. Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityKaohsiung, Taiwan.
  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityKaohsiung, Taiwan.
  3. Medical Research, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityKaohsiung, Taiwan.
  4. Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityKaohsiung, Taiwan.
  5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityKaohsiung, Taiwan.

PMID: 28469777 PMCID: PMC5411920

Abstract

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a new non-invasive method to induce tissue regeneration and repair the damaged osteoarthritis (OA) of knee. Previous studies suggested subchondral bone as the key target for OA treatment. However, the relationship of the effect and different locations of subchondral bone is unknown. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether the subchondral bone of medial tibia as the target for ESWT in early OA knee treatment and compared with various locations on lateral tibia and femur condyles. Application of ESWT on the medial tibial subchondral bone ameliorated 38% in gross pathological OA changes (compared to OA, P < 0.001), 94 % in OARSI score (compared to OA, P < 0.001) and 45% in cartilage defect (compared to OA, P < 0.001), 17% in bone mineral density (compared to OA, P < 0.001) than lateral tibia and femur. In micro-CT analysis, ESWT on medial tibial subchondral bone increased bone volume (61% vs 44% in tibia and 62% vs 53% in femur, P < 0.05), yield stress (6 MPa vs 4 MPa in tibia and 4 MPa vs 2 MPa in femur, P < 0.05) and decreased bone porosity (38% vs 53% in tibia and 37% vs 46% in femur, P < 0.05) than OA. The TUNEL, PCNA and osteocalcin significantly influenced the levels of molecular expression in different locations of ESWT application. Our results confirm that application of ESWT to the medial tibial subchondral bone has more effective therapy for OA knee than lateral locations of joint knee.

Keywords: Shockwave; cartilage; media tibia; osteoarthritis; subchondral bone

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 10;95(23):13361-2 - PubMed
  2. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Feb;73(2):336-48 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):2024-8 - PubMed
  4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 28;14 :44 - PubMed
  5. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1990 Oct;2(5):770-6 - PubMed
  6. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Dec;(213):34-40 - PubMed
  7. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991 Feb;27:44-5 - PubMed
  8. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Jan;14(1):13-29 - PubMed
  9. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Aug;131(8):1153-8 - PubMed
  10. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:465-80 - PubMed
  11. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;27(4):420-6 - PubMed
  12. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(6):223 - PubMed
  13. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;8(11):665-73 - PubMed
  14. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2006 Oct-Dec;6(4):376-8 - PubMed
  15. Int J Surg. 2015 Dec;24(Pt B):143-6 - PubMed
  16. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12 (4):R152 - PubMed
  17. J Rheumatol. 2003 Oct;30(10):2207-17 - PubMed
  18. Microsc Res Tech. 1997 May 15;37(4):343-57 - PubMed
  19. Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):349-55 - PubMed
  20. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Jun;11(6):412-23 - PubMed
  21. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jan;46(1):1-4 - PubMed
  22. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18(3):165-74 - PubMed
  23. J Surg Res. 2013 Dec;185(2):661-6 - PubMed
  24. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Sep;15(9):1093-6 - PubMed
  25. J Orthop Res. 2003 Nov;21(6):984-9 - PubMed
  26. J Biol Chem. 1986 Sep 25;261(27):12665-74 - PubMed
  27. J Surg Res. 2011 Dec;171(2):601-8 - PubMed
  28. J Surg Res. 2013 Aug;183(2):612-9 - PubMed
  29. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Oct;18 Suppl 3:S53-65 - PubMed
  30. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD003524 - PubMed
  31. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1998 May;10(3):256-62 - PubMed
  32. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2005 Dec;21(3):609-25, vi - PubMed
  33. Vet Rec. 2007 Jun 2;160(22):762-5 - PubMed
  34. Bone. 2006 Feb;38(2):234-43 - PubMed
  35. Bone. 2004 Apr;34(4):609-18 - PubMed
  36. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 May;7(3):325-6 - PubMed
  37. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jul 03;16(4):R139 - PubMed
  38. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2005;18(3):147-52 - PubMed
  39. Am J Vet Res. 2009 Apr;70(4):449-54 - PubMed
  40. J Surg Res. 2012 Nov;178(1):196-205 - PubMed
  41. Bone. 2012 Aug;51(2):190-6 - PubMed
  42. Acta Rheumatol Scand. 1961;7:240-8 - PubMed

Publication Types