Display options
Share it on

Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;23(6):395-400. doi: 10.1177/0963721414547736. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

Is Postpartum Depression a Disease of Modern Civilization?.

Current directions in psychological science

Jennifer Hahn-Holbrook, Martie Haselton

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Chapman University, University of California, Los Angeles.
  2. Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  3. Department of Communication Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
  4. Institute for Society and Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles.

PMID: 28503034 PMCID: PMC5426853 DOI: 10.1177/0963721414547736

Abstract

Access to calorie-dense foods, medicine, and other comforts has made modern humans healthier than our prehistoric ancestors in many respects. However, the epidemics of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease suggest that there are also drawbacks to modern living. Here, we address the question of whether the dramatic cultural changes that have occurred over the past century have inflated rates of postpartum depression, adding postpartum depression to the list of "diseases of modern civilization." We review evidence from cross-cultural, epidemiological, and experimental studies documenting associations between postpartum depression and modern patterns of early weaning, diets deficient in essential fatty acids, low levels of physical activity, low levels of sun exposure, and isolation from kin support networks, all of which mark significant divergences from lifestyles believed to have been typical throughout human evolutionary history. This "mismatch hypothesis" of postpartum depression integrates research across diverse research areas and generates novel predictions.

Keywords: evolutionary medicine; exercise; omega-3 fatty acids; postpartum depression; social support

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.

References

  1. CNS Spectr. 2005 Oct;10(10):792-9, 805 - PubMed
  2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Mar;91(3):757-70 - PubMed
  3. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Sep;54(3):438-63 - PubMed
  4. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Nov 15;64(10):896-900 - PubMed
  5. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013 Oct;16(5):411-22 - PubMed
  6. J Affect Disord. 2012 Nov;140(3):205-14 - PubMed
  7. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 Jan;20(1):1-17 - PubMed
  8. Clin Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;1(3):253-264 - PubMed
  9. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Nov;21(11):1189-95 - PubMed
  10. JAMA. 2010 Oct 20;304(15):1675-83 - PubMed
  11. Brain Behav Immun. 2009 Jul;23(5):700-8 - PubMed
  12. Mol Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;18(1):15-37 - PubMed
  13. Acta Paediatr. 2007 Apr;96(4):590-4 - PubMed
  14. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 May 23;12:36 - PubMed
  15. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006 Feb;65(1):1-6 - PubMed
  16. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Aug;36(9):1886-93 - PubMed
  17. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):599-607 - PubMed
  18. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 03;8(7):e67617 - PubMed
  19. Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):659-68 - PubMed
  20. Pediatrics. 2009 Apr;123(4):e736-51 - PubMed
  21. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jan;9(1):46-56 - PubMed
  22. J Paediatr Child Health. 1992;28 Suppl 1:S13-6 - PubMed
  23. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Feb;129(2):311-7 - PubMed
  24. J Affect Disord. 2002 May;69(1-3):15-29 - PubMed
  25. Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;202:100-7 - PubMed
  26. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2008 Apr;14(2):155-62 - PubMed
  27. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Oct;86(10):4933-8 - PubMed
  28. Arch Dis Child. 2007 Sep;92(9):737-40 - PubMed
  29. Health Psychol. 2002 Mar;21(2):187-93 - PubMed
  30. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;15(3):243-55 - PubMed
  31. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997 Apr;51(4):207-16 - PubMed
  32. Life Sci. 2003 Nov 7;73(25):3181-7 - PubMed
  33. Fam Pract. 2009 Apr;26(2):154-62 - PubMed
  34. Med Hypotheses. 2010 Jan;74(1):174-6 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support