Display options
Cite
Campos SM, Strauss C, Martins EP. In Space and Time: Territorial Animals are Attracted to Conspecific Chemical Cues. Ethology. 2017;123(2):136-144doi: 10.1111/eth.12582.
Campos, S. M., Strauss, C., & Martins, E. P. (2017). In Space and Time: Territorial Animals are Attracted to Conspecific Chemical Cues. Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 123(2), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12582
Campos, Stephanie M, et al. "In Space and Time: Territorial Animals are Attracted to Conspecific Chemical Cues." Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie vol. 123,2 (2017): 136-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12582
Campos SM, Strauss C, Martins EP. In Space and Time: Territorial Animals are Attracted to Conspecific Chemical Cues. Ethology. 2017 Feb;123(2):136-144. doi: 10.1111/eth.12582. Epub 2017 Jan 19. PMID: 28413237; PMCID: PMC5390687.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ethology. 2017 Feb;123(2):136-144. doi: 10.1111/eth.12582. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

In Space and Time: Territorial Animals are Attracted to Conspecific Chemical Cues.

Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie

Stephanie M Campos, Chloe Strauss, Emília P Martins

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

PMID: 28413237 PMCID: PMC5390687 DOI: 10.1111/eth.12582

Abstract

Territorial animals lay scent marks around their territories to broadcast their presence, but these olfactory signals can both attract and repel con-specifics. Attraction or aversion can have a profound impact in terms of space use and thereby influence an individual's access to resources and mates. Here, we test the impact of chemical signals on the long-term space use and activity of receivers, comparing the response of males and females, territory holders, and temporary visitors in

Keywords: Sceloporus; chemical signal; communication; resident; sex; space use; territory

References

  1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 5;367(1597):1909-22 - PubMed
  2. J Chem Ecol. 2006 Apr;32(4):881-93 - PubMed
  3. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jul 7;274(1618):1659-65 - PubMed
  4. Biol Lett. 2014 Apr 23;10(4):20140009 - PubMed
  5. Science. 2008 Aug 22;321(5892):1092-5 - PubMed
  6. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010 Oct;196(10):729-49 - PubMed
  7. J Exp Zool. 1981 Dec;218(3):351-61 - PubMed
  8. Biol Lett. 2007 Apr 22;3(2):125-7 - PubMed
  9. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015 Jan;201(1):171-82 - PubMed
  10. Horm Behav. 2012 Mar;61(3):445-53 - PubMed
  11. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 7;278(1702):122-30 - PubMed
  12. Horm Behav. 2009 Apr;55(4):520-9 - PubMed
  13. Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct;3(11):3925-34 - PubMed
  14. Am Nat. 2003 Jul;162(1):44-60 - PubMed
  15. Am Nat. 2010 May;175(5):E119-25 - PubMed
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jun 22;279(1737):2314-22 - PubMed
  17. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 7;277(1696):3027-33 - PubMed
  18. Trends Neurosci. 2013 May;36(5):305-12 - PubMed
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 16;281(1784):20140071 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 9;105(49):19052-9 - PubMed
  21. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jul 31;280(1767):20131398 - PubMed
  22. Am Nat. 2012 Oct;180(4):407-24 - PubMed
  23. J Evol Biol. 2015 Nov;28(11):1948-64 - PubMed
  24. Cell. 2015 Jun 4;161(6):1334-44 - PubMed
  25. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 7;279(1732):1359-65 - PubMed
  26. Behav Processes. 2013 Mar;94:109-14 - PubMed
  27. Science. 2012 Dec 14;338(6113):1462-5 - PubMed
  28. Science. 2012 Oct 12;338(6104):198-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support