Display options
Share it on

Biol Sport. 2017 Mar;34(1):19-26. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.63382. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

Anthropometric and physical characteristics allow differentiation of young female volleyball players according to playing position and level of expertise.

Biology of sport

M Milić, Z Grgantov, K Chamari, L P Ardigò, A Bianco, J Padulo

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
  2. Athlete Health and Performance Research Centre Aspetar, Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
  3. School of Exercise and Sport Science, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  4. Sport and Exercises Research Unit, University of Palermo, Italy.
  5. University eCampus, Novedrate, Italy.
  6. Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimization", National Center of Medicine and Science in Sport, Tunis, Tunisia.

PMID: 28416892 PMCID: PMC5377555 DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.63382

Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine the differences in some anthropometric and physical performance variables of young Croatian female volleyball players (aged 13 to 15) in relation to playing position (i.e., independent variable) and performance level within each position (i.e., independent variable). Players were categorized according to playing position (i.e., role) as middle blockers (n=28), opposite hitters (n=41), passer-hitters (n=54), setters (n=30), and liberos (n=28). Within each position, players were divided into a more successful group and a less successful group according to team ranking in the latest regional championship and player quality within the team. Height and body mass, somatotype by the Heath-Carter method, and four tests of lower body power, speed, agility and upper body power (i.e., dependent variables) were assessed. Players in different positions differed significantly in height and all three somatotype components, but no significant differences were found in body mass, body mass index or measured physical performance variables. Players of different performance level differed significantly in both anthropometric and physical performance variables. Generally, middle blockers were taller, more ectomorphic, less mesomorphic and endomorphic, whereas liberos were shorter, less ectomorphic, more mesomorphic and endomorphic than players in other positions. More successful players in all positions had a lower body mass index, were less mesomorphic and endomorphic, and more ectomorphic than less successful players. Furthermore, more successful players showed better lower body power, speed, agility and upper body power. The results of this study can potentially provide coaches with useful indications about the use of somatotype selection and physical performance assessment for talent identification and development.

Keywords: Analysis of variance; Anthropometry; Motor activity

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

References

  1. Coll Antropol. 2012 Jun;36(2):555-62 - PubMed
  2. J Sci Med Sport. 2008 Jun;11(3):337-44 - PubMed
  3. J Strength Cond Res. 2007 May;21(2):481-6 - PubMed
  4. J Sports Sci. 2011 Sep;29(12):1301-9 - PubMed
  5. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(12):1344-52 - PubMed
  6. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014 Dec;54(6):715-24 - PubMed
  7. J Sports Sci. 2005 Oct;23(10):1057-63 - PubMed
  8. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Sep;23(6):1858-66 - PubMed
  9. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006 Jun;46(2):271-80 - PubMed
  10. Coll Antropol. 2013 Mar;37(1):93-9 - PubMed
  11. Sports Med. 2000 Jul;30(1):1-15 - PubMed
  12. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Jul;40(7):649-51; discussion 651 - PubMed
  13. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug;26(8):2051-7 - PubMed
  14. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Mar;28(3):728-34 - PubMed
  15. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):741-9 - PubMed
  16. Coll Antropol. 2012 Sep;36(3):959-66 - PubMed
  17. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(2):137-48 - PubMed
  18. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jun;26(6):1475-80 - PubMed
  19. J Sports Sci. 1992 Apr;10(2):131-8 - PubMed
  20. Springerplus. 2013 Oct 09;2:520 - PubMed
  21. J Sports Sci. 2009 Feb 1;27(3):257-66 - PubMed
  22. Coll Antropol. 2006 Mar;30(1):103-12 - PubMed
  23. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001 Jun;41(2):256-62 - PubMed
  24. J Sports Sci. 2000 Sep;18(9):695-702 - PubMed
  25. J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1192-6 - PubMed
  26. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jul;23(4):1106-11 - PubMed
  27. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1991 Sep;31(3):380-4 - PubMed
  28. J Hum Kinet. 2013 Oct 08;38:45-52 - PubMed
  29. Coll Antropol. 2006 Mar;30(1):87-96 - PubMed
  30. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5):1524-9 - PubMed
  31. J Sports Sci. 2007 Oct;25(12):1337-44 - PubMed
  32. Coll Antropol. 2007 Mar;31(1):267-73 - PubMed
  33. Coll Antropol. 2013 May;37 Suppl 2:61-8 - PubMed
  34. J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Aug;21(3):902-8 - PubMed

Publication Types