Biol Sport. 2017 Mar;34(1):19-26. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.63382. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Anthropometric and physical characteristics allow differentiation of young female volleyball players according to playing position and level of expertise.
Biology of sport
M Milić, Z Grgantov, K Chamari, L P Ardigò, A Bianco, J Padulo
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
- Athlete Health and Performance Research Centre Aspetar, Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
- School of Exercise and Sport Science, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
- Sport and Exercises Research Unit, University of Palermo, Italy.
- University eCampus, Novedrate, Italy.
- Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimization", National Center of Medicine and Science in Sport, Tunis, Tunisia.
PMID: 28416892
PMCID: PMC5377555 DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.63382
Abstract
The aim of our study was to determine the differences in some anthropometric and physical performance variables of young Croatian female volleyball players (aged 13 to 15) in relation to playing position (i.e., independent variable) and performance level within each position (i.e., independent variable). Players were categorized according to playing position (i.e., role) as middle blockers (n=28), opposite hitters (n=41), passer-hitters (n=54), setters (n=30), and liberos (n=28). Within each position, players were divided into a more successful group and a less successful group according to team ranking in the latest regional championship and player quality within the team. Height and body mass, somatotype by the Heath-Carter method, and four tests of lower body power, speed, agility and upper body power (i.e., dependent variables) were assessed. Players in different positions differed significantly in height and all three somatotype components, but no significant differences were found in body mass, body mass index or measured physical performance variables. Players of different performance level differed significantly in both anthropometric and physical performance variables. Generally, middle blockers were taller, more ectomorphic, less mesomorphic and endomorphic, whereas liberos were shorter, less ectomorphic, more mesomorphic and endomorphic than players in other positions. More successful players in all positions had a lower body mass index, were less mesomorphic and endomorphic, and more ectomorphic than less successful players. Furthermore, more successful players showed better lower body power, speed, agility and upper body power. The results of this study can potentially provide coaches with useful indications about the use of somatotype selection and physical performance assessment for talent identification and development.
Keywords: Analysis of variance; Anthropometry; Motor activity
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.
References
- Coll Antropol. 2012 Jun;36(2):555-62 - PubMed
- J Sci Med Sport. 2008 Jun;11(3):337-44 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2007 May;21(2):481-6 - PubMed
- J Sports Sci. 2011 Sep;29(12):1301-9 - PubMed
- J Sports Sci. 2013;31(12):1344-52 - PubMed
- J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014 Dec;54(6):715-24 - PubMed
- J Sports Sci. 2005 Oct;23(10):1057-63 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Sep;23(6):1858-66 - PubMed
- J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006 Jun;46(2):271-80 - PubMed
- Coll Antropol. 2013 Mar;37(1):93-9 - PubMed
- Sports Med. 2000 Jul;30(1):1-15 - PubMed
- Br J Sports Med. 2006 Jul;40(7):649-51; discussion 651 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug;26(8):2051-7 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Mar;28(3):728-34 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):741-9 - PubMed
- Coll Antropol. 2012 Sep;36(3):959-66 - PubMed
- J Sports Sci. 2014;32(2):137-48 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jun;26(6):1475-80 - PubMed
- J Sports Sci. 1992 Apr;10(2):131-8 - PubMed
- Springerplus. 2013 Oct 09;2:520 - PubMed
- J Sports Sci. 2009 Feb 1;27(3):257-66 - PubMed
- Coll Antropol. 2006 Mar;30(1):103-12 - PubMed
- J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001 Jun;41(2):256-62 - PubMed
- J Sports Sci. 2000 Sep;18(9):695-702 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1192-6 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jul;23(4):1106-11 - PubMed
- J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1991 Sep;31(3):380-4 - PubMed
- J Hum Kinet. 2013 Oct 08;38:45-52 - PubMed
- Coll Antropol. 2006 Mar;30(1):87-96 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5):1524-9 - PubMed
- J Sports Sci. 2007 Oct;25(12):1337-44 - PubMed
- Coll Antropol. 2007 Mar;31(1):267-73 - PubMed
- Coll Antropol. 2013 May;37 Suppl 2:61-8 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Aug;21(3):902-8 - PubMed
Publication Types