Global Spine J. 2017 Apr;7(2):170-178. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699182. Epub 2017 May 01.
Effectiveness of Operative and Nonoperative Care for Adult Spinal Deformity: Systematic Review of the Literature.
Global spine journal
Alisson R Teles, Tobias A Mattei, Orlando Righesso, Asdrubal Falavigna
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences - Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Neurosurgery & Spine Specialists, Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, Maine, USA.
- Department of Orthopedics, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
PMID: 28507887
PMCID: PMC5415160 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699182
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE: There is a need for synthesizing data on effectiveness of treatments for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) due to its increasing prevalence and health care costs for these patients. The objective of this review was to estimate the effectiveness of surgery versus nonoperative care in patients with ASD.
METHODS: A systematic review of articles in published in English using PubMed between 2005 and 2015. Surgical and nonsurgical series that reported baseline and follow-up health-related quality of life measures of patients with ASD with a minimum 2 years of follow-up were selected. Independent extraction of articles by 2 authors using predefined data fields, including risk of bias assessment.
RESULTS: Surgery significantly reduces disability, pain, and improves patients' quality of life. The average postoperative improvement in Oswestry Disability Index was -19.1 (±9.0), Numerical Rating Scale back pain -4.14 (±1.38), Numerical Rating Scale leg pain -3.36 (±1.33), Short-Form Health Survey 36-SF36-Physical Component score 11.2 (±5.07), and Short-Form Health Survey 36-Mental Component score 9.93 (±4.96). The complication rate ranged from 9.52% to 81.52% (mean = 39.62%), and the need for revision surgery ranged from 1.72% to 40.0% (mean = 15.71%). The best existing evidence about nonoperative care of ASD is provided from observational studies with very high risk of bias. Quantitative analyses of nonsurgical cohorts did not demonstrate significant changes in quality of life of patients after 2 years of observation.
CONCLUSIONS: This data may assist clinicians to counsel patients, as well as to inform health care providers and policymakers about what to expect from the treatment for ASD.
Keywords: adult; quality of life; scoliosis; surgery; systematic review
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82 - PubMed
- J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):886-92 - PubMed
- ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6 - PubMed
- Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):925-48 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1413-9 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 15;35(20):1861-6 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Oct;15(4):399-403 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May;22(5):540-53 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10 ):884-90 - PubMed
- Disabil Rehabil. 2015 ;37(25):2367-74 - PubMed
- PLoS Biol. 2015 Apr 22;13(4):e1002128 - PubMed
- BMC Surg. 2015 Mar 15;15:26 - PubMed
- ANZ J Surg. 2014 Oct;84(10 ):781-5 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1762-8 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2171-8 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):E803-12 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22 Suppl 1):S43-50 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):E519-27 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 15;35(20):1872-5 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1878-86 - PubMed
- Eur Spine J. 2008 May;17 (5):650-6 - PubMed
- Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Mar;153(3):547-55 - PubMed
- J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jul;21(5):310-5 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):128-33 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2126-33 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 1;39(25):2103-7 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2165-70 - PubMed
- Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May;36(5):E2 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):817-24 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1082-5 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1763-70 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17 ):E599-606 - PubMed
- J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):805-11 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 15;31(8):941-7 - PubMed
- Spine J. 2015 Dec 1;15(12 ):2459-65 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):725-30 - PubMed
- Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):968-74 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):143-9 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):E795-9 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 1;35(5):578-82 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 15;35(2):227-34 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):349-59 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 1;38(21):1853-61 - PubMed
- Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013 Apr;24(2):293-304 - PubMed
- Eur Spine J. 2009 Apr;18(4):531-7 - PubMed
- J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Jul;21(7):419-26 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Mar 15;38(6):476-83 - PubMed
- Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Sep 15;40(18):1414-21 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1776-83 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):1059-66 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):1693-8 - PubMed
Publication Types