Display options
Share it on

Global Spine J. 2017 Apr;7(2):170-178. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699182. Epub 2017 May 01.

Effectiveness of Operative and Nonoperative Care for Adult Spinal Deformity: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Global spine journal

Alisson R Teles, Tobias A Mattei, Orlando Righesso, Asdrubal Falavigna

Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences - Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  2. Neurosurgery & Spine Specialists, Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, Maine, USA.
  3. Department of Orthopedics, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  4. Department of Neurosurgery, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

PMID: 28507887 PMCID: PMC5415160 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699182

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: There is a need for synthesizing data on effectiveness of treatments for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) due to its increasing prevalence and health care costs for these patients. The objective of this review was to estimate the effectiveness of surgery versus nonoperative care in patients with ASD.

METHODS: A systematic review of articles in published in English using PubMed between 2005 and 2015. Surgical and nonsurgical series that reported baseline and follow-up health-related quality of life measures of patients with ASD with a minimum 2 years of follow-up were selected. Independent extraction of articles by 2 authors using predefined data fields, including risk of bias assessment.

RESULTS: Surgery significantly reduces disability, pain, and improves patients' quality of life. The average postoperative improvement in Oswestry Disability Index was -19.1 (±9.0), Numerical Rating Scale back pain -4.14 (±1.38), Numerical Rating Scale leg pain -3.36 (±1.33), Short-Form Health Survey 36-SF36-Physical Component score 11.2 (±5.07), and Short-Form Health Survey 36-Mental Component score 9.93 (±4.96). The complication rate ranged from 9.52% to 81.52% (mean = 39.62%), and the need for revision surgery ranged from 1.72% to 40.0% (mean = 15.71%). The best existing evidence about nonoperative care of ASD is provided from observational studies with very high risk of bias. Quantitative analyses of nonsurgical cohorts did not demonstrate significant changes in quality of life of patients after 2 years of observation.

CONCLUSIONS: This data may assist clinicians to counsel patients, as well as to inform health care providers and policymakers about what to expect from the treatment for ASD.

Keywords: adult; quality of life; scoliosis; surgery; systematic review

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82 - PubMed
  2. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):886-92 - PubMed
  3. ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6 - PubMed
  4. Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):925-48 - PubMed
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1413-9 - PubMed
  6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 15;35(20):1861-6 - PubMed
  7. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Oct;15(4):399-403 - PubMed
  8. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May;22(5):540-53 - PubMed
  9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10 ):884-90 - PubMed
  10. Disabil Rehabil. 2015 ;37(25):2367-74 - PubMed
  11. PLoS Biol. 2015 Apr 22;13(4):e1002128 - PubMed
  12. BMC Surg. 2015 Mar 15;15:26 - PubMed
  13. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Oct;84(10 ):781-5 - PubMed
  14. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1762-8 - PubMed
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2171-8 - PubMed
  16. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):E803-12 - PubMed
  17. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22 Suppl 1):S43-50 - PubMed
  18. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):E519-27 - PubMed
  19. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 15;35(20):1872-5 - PubMed
  20. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1878-86 - PubMed
  21. Eur Spine J. 2008 May;17 (5):650-6 - PubMed
  22. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Mar;153(3):547-55 - PubMed
  23. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jul;21(5):310-5 - PubMed
  24. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):128-33 - PubMed
  25. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2126-33 - PubMed
  26. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 1;39(25):2103-7 - PubMed
  27. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2165-70 - PubMed
  28. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May;36(5):E2 - PubMed
  29. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):817-24 - PubMed
  30. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1082-5 - PubMed
  31. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1763-70 - PubMed
  32. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17 ):E599-606 - PubMed
  33. J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10 - PubMed
  34. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):805-11 - PubMed
  35. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 15;31(8):941-7 - PubMed
  36. Spine J. 2015 Dec 1;15(12 ):2459-65 - PubMed
  37. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):725-30 - PubMed
  38. Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):968-74 - PubMed
  39. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):143-9 - PubMed
  40. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):E795-9 - PubMed
  41. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 1;35(5):578-82 - PubMed
  42. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 15;35(2):227-34 - PubMed
  43. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):349-59 - PubMed
  44. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 1;38(21):1853-61 - PubMed
  45. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013 Apr;24(2):293-304 - PubMed
  46. Eur Spine J. 2009 Apr;18(4):531-7 - PubMed
  47. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Jul;21(7):419-26 - PubMed
  48. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Mar 15;38(6):476-83 - PubMed
  49. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3 - PubMed
  50. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Sep 15;40(18):1414-21 - PubMed
  51. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1776-83 - PubMed
  52. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):1059-66 - PubMed
  53. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):1693-8 - PubMed

Publication Types