Display options
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 30;7(9):3132-3142. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2906. eCollection 2017 May.

Exploring the impact of multidecadal environmental changes on the population genetic structure of a marine primary producer.

Ecology and evolution

Nina Lundholm, Sofia Ribeiro, Anna Godhe, Lene Rostgaard Nielsen, Marianne Ellegaard

Affiliations

  1. The Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen K Denmark.
  2. Glaciology and Climate Department Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) Copenhagen K Denmark.
  3. Department of Marine Sciences University of Gothenburg Göteborg Sweden.
  4. Deparment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg Denmark.
  5. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg Denmark.

PMID: 28480012 PMCID: PMC5415532 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2906

Abstract

Many marine protists form resting stages that can remain viable in coastal sediments for several decades. Their long-term survival offers the possibility to explore the impact of changes in environmental conditions on population dynamics over multidecadal time scales. Resting stages of the phototrophic dinoflagellate

Keywords: dinoflagellate; environmental change; microsatellites; phytoplankton resting stage; population genetic structure; sediment core

References

  1. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 23;5(12):e15557 - PubMed
  2. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22965 - PubMed
  3. Geobiology. 2011 Sep;9(5):377-93 - PubMed
  4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jan 12;365(1537):87-97 - PubMed
  5. Science. 2010 Aug 20;329(5994):940-3 - PubMed
  6. Mol Ecol. 2009 Jun;18(11):2337-52 - PubMed
  7. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Sep;9(5):1322-32 - PubMed
  8. Biol Lett. 2013 Nov 27;9(6):20130849 - PubMed
  9. ISME J. 2013 Oct;7(10):2057-9 - PubMed
  10. Nat Commun. 2011;2:311 - PubMed
  11. Ecol Evol. 2012 Oct;2(10):2588-99 - PubMed
  12. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 20;104(12):5002-7 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 8;108(10):4252-7 - PubMed
  15. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2011;3:227-60 - PubMed
  16. Mol Ecol. 2014 Feb;23(3):549-60 - PubMed
  17. Microorganisms. 2014 Jan 03;2(1):11-32 - PubMed
  18. Mol Ecol. 2005 May;14(6):1631-40 - PubMed
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):12876-7 - PubMed
  20. Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20 - PubMed
  21. Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;14(9):2395-404 - PubMed
  22. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 11;8(4):e61184 - PubMed
  23. Evolution. 2014 Dec;68(12):3381-94 - PubMed
  24. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016 Jul;92(7): - PubMed
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):12952-7 - PubMed
  26. Mol Ecol. 2010 Oct;19(20):4478-90 - PubMed
  27. Environ Microbiol. 2015 May;17(5):1510-9 - PubMed
  28. Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 30;7(9):3132-3142 - PubMed
  29. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7 - PubMed
  30. Mol Ecol. 2009 May;18(10):2122-33 - PubMed
  31. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 15;9(12):e114984 - PubMed
  32. Mol Ecol. 2002 Feb;11(2):197-214 - PubMed
  33. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59 - PubMed
  34. Environ Microbiol. 2016 Dec;18(12):4403-4411 - PubMed
  35. Mol Ecol. 2015 Jun;24(11):2871-85 - PubMed
  36. Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370 - PubMed

Publication Types