Display options
Share it on

Int J Womens Health. 2017 Apr 13;9:199-204. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S122586. eCollection 2017.

A revisit of the fetal foot length and fetal measurements in early pregnancy sonography.

International journal of women's health

Hong Soo Wong

Affiliations

  1. Australian Women's Ultrasound Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  2. Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

PMID: 28450790 PMCID: PMC5399981 DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S122586

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present the fetal measurements in relation to the foot length at 10-16 weeks gestation on antenatal ultrasound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the fetal measurements in 47 scans performed at 10-16 weeks gestation in women attending routine antenatal care. The fetal measurements and measurement ratios were examined in relation to the foot length.

RESULTS: The fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length and foot length increase linearly with the gestational age at 10-16 weeks gestation. The correlation between fetal foot length and fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length are better than with the crown rump length. The femur length to foot length ratio and the femur length to abdominal circumference ratios increase with the gestational age in an inverse relationship throughout the same period.

CONCLUSION: Fetal foot length is an accurate estimate of the gestational age in early pregnancy. Compared with crown rump length, the correlation between foot length and other fetal measurements is better. The fetal measurements ratios are gestational age dependent between 10-16 weeks. Gestational age specific ratio should be used in this period.

Keywords: diagnosis; first trimester; growth and development; obstetrics; pregnancy; prenatal; statistics and numerical data; ultrasonography

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  1. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;27(2):145-57 - PubMed
  2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Oct;159(4):923-6 - PubMed
  3. Hum Reprod. 2009 Aug;24(8):1825-33 - PubMed
  4. Genet Med. 2009 Feb;11(2):127-33 - PubMed
  5. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jan;63(1):26-32 - PubMed
  6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):16-9 - PubMed
  7. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Aug;72(2):181-4 - PubMed
  8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Feb;156(2):350-5 - PubMed
  9. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Jul;85(1):F60-4 - PubMed
  10. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;116(1):22-5 - PubMed
  11. Clin Anat. 1999;12(2):84-93 - PubMed
  12. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;34(2):160-70 - PubMed
  13. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Jan;99(1):38-42 - PubMed
  14. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Apr;71(4):526-31 - PubMed
  15. Prenat Diagn. 2011 Jan;31(1):115-24 - PubMed

Publication Types