Display options
Share it on

Afr J Infect Dis. 2013 Aug 09;7(2):31-35. doi: 10.4314/ajid.v7i2.3.

Comparing Influenza Positivity Rates by Real-Time RT-PCR, Elisa and Viral Culture Methods in Côte D'Ivoire, West Africa, in 2009.

African journal of infectious diseases

Ndahwouh Talla Nzussouo, Herve Adje Kadjo, Daouda Coulibaly, Euloge Ekaza, Bertin Kouakou, David Coulibaly N'Golo, Stefano Tempia, Richard Davis, Mireille Dosso, Mark Thompson

Affiliations

  1. Influenza Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), South Africa.
  2. Global Disease Detection and Response Program/U.S.-Naval Medical Research Unit-3 (NAMRU-3), South Africa.
  3. Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), Room 230 P.O Box LG 581, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra.
  4. Institut Pasteur Côte d'Ivoire (IPCI), South Africa.
  5. Institut National d'Hygiene Publique, Côte d'Ivoire (INHP); National Institute for Communicable Diseases, South Africa.

PMID: 28451079 PMCID: PMC5352954 DOI: 10.4314/ajid.v7i2.3

Abstract

Detection of circulating influenza strains is a key public health concern especially in limited-resource settings where diagnosis capabilities remain a challenge. As part of multi-site surveillance in Côte d'Ivoire during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic, we had the opportunity to test respiratory specimens collected from patients with acute respiratory illness (ARI). We analyzed and compared the percentage of specimens testing positive using three laboratory methods (rtRT-PCR, ELISA, viral culture). From January to October 2009, 1,356 respiratory specimens were collected from patients with acute respiratory illness and shipped at the WHO NIC (Institut Pasteur) Cote d'Ivoire, and 453 (33%) tested positive for influenza by one or more laboratory methods. The proportion of positive influenza tests did not differ by the sex or age of the patient or presenting symptoms, but did differ depending on the timing and site of specimen collection. Of the 453 positive specimens, 424 (93.6%) were detected by PCR, 199 (43.9%) by ELISA and 40 (8.8%) by viral culture. While seasonal influenza A(H1N1) virus strains were prominent, only four 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) cases were detected. Use of molecular biology method (rtRT-PCR) increased sensitivity and diagnosis capabilities. Among all three methods used, rRT-PCR was the most sensitive and rapid method. More capacity building is still required for viral culture. Need to collect denominator data in order to have an accurate estimate of the burden of influenza. There was delayed introduction of pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009 in Cote d'Ivoire.

Keywords: Africa; ELISA; influenza; patients; rRT-PCR; viral culture

References

  1. J Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 15;199(2):159-67 - PubMed
  2. J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;157(5):808-14 - PubMed
  3. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Mar;11(3):223-35 - PubMed
  4. Infection. 2009 Oct;37(5):401-6 - PubMed
  5. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2008 May;2(3):81-92 - PubMed
  6. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Jun;40(6):2051-6 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Feb;42(2):759-63 - PubMed
  8. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Oct 25;51(7):1-10 - PubMed

Publication Types