Bot Stud. 2014 Dec;55(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1999-3110-55-34. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
Chlorophyll and carbohydrate metabolism in developing silique and seed are prerequisite to seed oil content of Brassica napus L.
Botanical studies
Shuijin Hua, Zhong-Hua Chen, Yaofeng Zhang, Huasheng Yu, Baogang Lin, Dongqing Zhang
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310021, P.R. China. [email protected].
- School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, 2751NSW, Australia.
- Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310021, P.R. China.
- Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310021, P.R. China. [email protected].
PMID: 28510961
PMCID: PMC5432831 DOI: 10.1186/1999-3110-55-34
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the seed oil content in canola is a crucial quality determining trait, the regulatory mechanisms of its formation are not fully discovered. This study compared the silique and seed physiological characteristics including fresh and dry weight, seed oil content, chlorophyll content, and carbohydrate content in a high oil content line (HOCL) and a low oil content line (LOCL) of canola derived from a recombinant inbred line in 2010, 2011, and 2012. The aim of the investigation is to uncover the physiological regulation of silique and seed developmental events on seed oil content in canola.
RESULTS: On average, 83% and 86% of silique matter while 69% and 63% of seed matter was produced before 30 days after anthesis (DAA) in HOCL and LOCL, respectively, over three years. Furthermore, HOCL exhibited significantly higher fresh and dry matter at most developmental stages of siliques and seeds. From 20 DAA, lipids were deposited in the seed of HOCL significantly faster than that of LOCL, which was validated by transmission electron microscopy, showing that HOCL accumulates considerable more oil bodies in the seed cells. Markedly higher silique chlorophyll content was observed in HOCL consistently over the three consecutive years, implying a higher potential of photosynthetic capacity in siliques of HOCL. As a consequence, HOCL exhibited significantly higher content of fructose, glucose, sucrose, and starch mainly at 20 to 45 DAA, a key stage of seed lipid deposition. Moreover, seed sugar content was usually higher than silique indicating the importance of sugar transportation from siliques to seeds as substrate for lipid biosynthesis. The much lower silique cellulose content in HOCL was beneficial for lipid synthesis rather than consuming excessive carbohydrate for cell wall.
CONCLUSIONS: Superior physiological characteristics of siliques in HOCL showed advantage to produce more photosynthetic assimilates, which were highly correlated to seed oil contents.
Keywords: Biomass; Brassica napus L; Carbohydrate; Chlorophyll content; Seed oil content
References
- Plant Cell Physiol. 2012 Aug;53(8):1380-90 - PubMed
- J Integr Plant Biol. 2009 Aug;51(8):792-9 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2012 Oct;160(2):1023-36 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2005 Oct;139(2):701-12 - PubMed
- Planta. 2007 Aug;226(3):773-83 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009 Jun;47(6):448-55 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2008;59(15):4247-57 - PubMed
- New Phytol. 2010 Aug;187(3):791-804 - PubMed
- Plant J. 2009 Feb;57(4):690-705 - PubMed
- Phytochemistry. 2011 Jan;72(1):59-67 - PubMed
- Plant J. 2012 Feb;69(3):432-44 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2008 Sep;148(1):504-18 - PubMed
- Plant Cell. 2007 Jun;19(6):2006-22 - PubMed
- Plant J. 2006 Apr;46(1):69-84 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 1997 May;114(1):153-160 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2012 Jul;159(3):1221-34 - PubMed
- New Phytol. 2011 Jun;190(4):838-53 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2003 Jan;54(382):477-88 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2008 Jan;146(1):277-88 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 1998 Sep;118(1):91-101 - PubMed
- Plant Cell. 1995 Sep;7(9):1395-403 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2003 Jan;54(381):259-70 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2676-86 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2001 Aug;52(361):1655-63 - PubMed
- Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Jan;122(1):21-31 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2011 Jul;156(3):1577-88 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2004 Oct;136(2):3341-9 - PubMed
- Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Jul;125(2):285-96 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2003 Aug;54(389):1919-30 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2006 Sep;142(1):88-97 - PubMed
- Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Nov;113(7):1331-45 - PubMed
- Plant Cell. 2002 Jun;14(6):1191-206 - PubMed
- Photosynth Res. 1981 Jun;2(2):115-41 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2000 Dec;124(4):1582-94 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2010 Apr;152(4):2078-87 - PubMed
- BMC Genomics. 2009 Jun 02;10:256 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2009 May;150(1):27-41 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2003 Jan;131(1):228-36 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2006 May;141(1):32-46 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2008;59(12):3283-95 - PubMed
- Anal Biochem. 1969 Dec;32(3):420-4 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2008 Aug;147(4):2121-30 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2000 Dec;51(353):1991-9 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2003 Jan;54(382):457-65 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2009 Oct;151(2):857-68 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 1992 Jun;99(2):700-6 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2010 Oct;61(15):4313-24 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2008 Oct;148(2):1042-54 - PubMed
Publication Types