Display options
Cite
Nourzadeh M, Amini A, Fakoor F, et al. Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of . Iran Endod J. 2017;12(2):205-210doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.40.
Nourzadeh, M., Amini, A., Fakoor, F., Raoof, M., & Sharififar, F. (2017). Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of . Iranian endodontic journal, 12(2), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.40
Nourzadeh, Mahdieh, et al. "Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of ." Iranian endodontic journal vol. 12,2 (2017): 205-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.40
Nourzadeh M, Amini A, Fakoor F, Raoof M, Sharififar F. Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of . Iran Endod J. 2017;12(2):205-210. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.40. PMID: 28512487; PMCID: PMC5431725.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Iran Endod J. 2017;12(2):205-210. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.40.

Comparative Antimicrobial Efficacy of .

Iranian endodontic journal

Mahdieh Nourzadeh, Arezu Amini, Farzaneh Fakoor, Maryam Raoof, Fariba Sharififar

Affiliations

  1. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research, Dental Research Center, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Dental School, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
  3. Department of microbiology, Medical School, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
  4. Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
  5. Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran.

PMID: 28512487 PMCID: PMC5431725 DOI: 10.22037/iej.2017.40

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of

METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred twenty mandibular premolars were randomly divided into 8 groups:

RESULTS: All irrigants reduced more than 99% of bacteria in root canal. In the presence of

CONCLUSION: Although 5.25% NaOCl was the most effective irrigant, all agents exerted acceptable antimicrobial activity against

Keywords: Antibacterial Agent; Eucalyptus; Myrtus; Root Canal Therapy

Conflict of interest statement

‘None declared’.

References

  1. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jun;99(6):768-72 - PubMed
  2. Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Mar;50(3):113-6 - PubMed
  3. Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):424-8 - PubMed
  4. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003 Dec;89(2-3):277-83 - PubMed
  5. J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):279-282 - PubMed
  6. J Endod. 2006 May;32(5):389-98 - PubMed
  7. Molecules. 2010 Apr 15;15(4):2759-70 - PubMed
  8. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(4):4673-95 - PubMed
  9. Braz Dent J. 2003;14(1):58-62 - PubMed
  10. Int Endod J. 2001 Mar;34(2):120-32 - PubMed
  11. Int Endod J. 2003 Apr;36(4):267-75 - PubMed
  12. Int Endod J. 1997 Jul;30(4):279-82 - PubMed
  13. Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):10-7 - PubMed
  14. Iran Endod J. 2016 Winter;11(1):75-8 - PubMed
  15. Iran Endod J. 2015 Fall;10(4):216-20 - PubMed
  16. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004;39(1):60-4 - PubMed
  17. J Dent Res. 1987 Aug;66(8):1375-9 - PubMed
  18. J Endod. 1999 May;25(5):332-5 - PubMed
  19. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Jul;98(7):1273-8 - PubMed
  20. J Dent (Shiraz). 2014 Mar;15(1):39-43 - PubMed
  21. J Endod. 2001 Jul;27(7):452-5 - PubMed
  22. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Sep;17(5):449-53 - PubMed
  23. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Jul;11(4):469-74 - PubMed
  24. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Sep 01;15(5):308-20 - PubMed
  25. Acta Neuropathol. 1984;63(1):18-23 - PubMed
  26. J Endod. 2010 Jan;36(1):83-6 - PubMed
  27. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:680354 - PubMed
  28. J Endod. 2008 Nov;34(11):1346-1350 - PubMed
  29. Int Endod J. 2003 Jun;36(6):423-32 - PubMed
  30. Iran Endod J. 2016 Fall;11(4):315-319 - PubMed

Publication Types